Dwight to GS Warriors?
#1
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:25 PM
#2
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:27 PM
and if Orlando was going to trade Howard then the other team will def have to take either Turk's or Gilbert's contract in return
#3
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:28 PM
reeballin4, on 18 June 2011 - 05:25 PM, said:
Wow. That seems to me to be a pretty low-ball offer for Dwight. It's so early in the process though, you know there will most likely be much better offers and many more teams trying to get involved before it's all said and done.
#4
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:37 PM
Seano, on 18 June 2011 - 05:28 PM, said:
That's the 1 yr rental rate I was speaking about.
#5
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:43 PM
A) this is an offer without a guarantee Dwight would resign and they do have the capspace and are sending out enough assets to take on one of Orlando's bad contracts.
B) it's the first salvo in what's to be a (hopefully) season full of trade offers for Dwight. The bar is set so teams now have to up the ante from GS original offer to get the Magic interested.
Remember how the Nets got New York and others to keep adding assets for Melo
#6
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:52 PM
CrawfulToCrawesome, on 18 June 2011 - 05:43 PM, said:
A) this is an offer without a guarantee Dwight would resign and they do have the capspace and are sending out enough assets to take on one of Orlando's bad contracts.
B) it's the first salvo in what's to be a (hopefully) season full of trade offers for Dwight. The bar is set so teams now have to up the ante from GS original offer to get the Magic interested.
Remember how the Nets got New York and others to keep adding assets for Melo
Good points.
#7
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:15 PM
#8
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:21 PM
[url="http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6b5axdh"][url]http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6b5axdh[/url][/url]
Joe, Al, Zaza, Kirk, and Marvin for Dwight, Gilbert, and Hedo might get them to think twice because we take there bad contracts along with Howard. Howard would then be signed to a max deal like what Joe had.
#9
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:45 PM
Dwight
Lee
Wright
Probably draft Burks
Curry.
And Dwight will love having bible study with Mark Jackson who just so happens to be a pastor.
Just take on a bad contract and this appeals to Orlando especially since it's out of conference.
Can't wait for Houston's offer. McHale with Dwight could be a sight.
#10
Posted 18 June 2011 - 06:57 PM
TRUEINTELLECTPLAYA, on 18 June 2011 - 06:21 PM, said:
http://games.espn.go...tradeId=6b5axdh
Joe, Al, Zaza, Kirk, and Marvin for Dwight, Gilbert, and Hedo might get them to think twice because we take there bad contracts along with Howard. Howard would then be signed to a max deal like what Joe had.
lol our 2 best players plus a talented combo guard, a back up center, and Marvin for Gunboy, Turkey, and a Dwight Howard that isn't signed long term. Stick to your day job
#11
Posted 18 June 2011 - 07:39 PM
Supporter, on 18 June 2011 - 06:57 PM, said:
I obviously stated that Dwight would then be signed to a contract like Joe's which means a long term max deal you guys just like to argue for the fact of arguing and post to see your numbers improve
#12
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:12 PM
CrawfulToCrawesome, on 18 June 2011 - 06:45 PM, said:
Dwight
Lee
Wright
Probably draft Burks
Curry.
And Dwight will love having bible study with Mark Jackson who just so happens to be a pastor.
Just take on a bad contract and this appeals to Orlando especially since it's out of conference.
Can't wait for Houston's offer. McHale with Dwight could be a sight.
Well given the element of uncertainty and the very real risk that he might walk out of wherever he is traded to at the end of next season anyway, that's probably a fair offer for an unsigned Dwight. However if I was the GM in this case, I wouldn't make the deal unless either Dwight is signed OR I know for an absolute fact and that it is an ironclad certainty that I could sign him to a long term contract. Otherwise, no way. I would not give up trading assets like that for a one year rental player, and it's not like Dwight is gonna suddenly elevate the Warriors into true contention status, because he's not. They've got deeper problems than the lack of a dominant C.
#13
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:16 PM
#14
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:35 PM
Seano, on 18 June 2011 - 09:12 PM, said:
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















