This trade is what you want.
Started by
Swatguy
, Jun 28 2011 09:53 AM
15 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 28 June 2011 - 09:53 AM
#3
Posted 28 June 2011 - 10:54 AM
#4
Posted 28 June 2011 - 10:57 AM
Its not a trade I would want.
Mo Williams is vastly overrated
Kamen is on the downside and extremely injury prone
Bogans really doesn't bring anything
We give up our featured player to get rid of Marvin (who is much better then Bogans).
Mo Williams is vastly overrated
Kamen is on the downside and extremely injury prone
Bogans really doesn't bring anything
We give up our featured player to get rid of Marvin (who is much better then Bogans).
#5
Posted 28 June 2011 - 11:43 AM
capstone21, on 28 June 2011 - 10:57 AM, said:
Its not a trade I would want.
Mo Williams is vastly overrated
Kamen is on the downside and extremely injury prone
Bogans really doesn't bring anything
We give up our featured player to get rid of Marvin (who is much better then Bogans).
Mo Williams is vastly overrated
Kamen is on the downside and extremely injury prone
Bogans really doesn't bring anything
We give up our featured player to get rid of Marvin (who is much better then Bogans).
Well, Mo is a very good shooter. He would be a change of pace from Jeff and bring that scoring off the bench. Did I say experience? Experienced.
Kamen is that 7 footer that can score and rebound. With Al and Zaza in tow he may need to bring but 26 minutes a game which can reduce injuries. Oh, he defends too.
Bogans is a big guard defender that can make the three. He is what Mo Evans wants to be. With Jeff and Kirk starting, Mo and Bogans would be deadly of the bench.
Our featured player is choking the cap. He is underachieving with every measure. He has already began his decline, Did I say he is KILLING the CAP? He's killing the cap with little bang and major disappointments.
And we free us from Marvin.
#7
#8
Posted 28 June 2011 - 09:32 PM
Kaman
Horford
Smith
Hinrich
Teague
Zaza
Evans
Damian
Bogans
Mo
Twin
Benson
Rolle
Lighty
Sy
That second group is tough as nails. I saw that Hollinger projection, it means little. What we do know is we have to be tougher in this east. This team is much tougher with Kaman, Evans, Bogans, Mo and Lighty. That with All the other holdovers, we'd be tough.
Horford
Smith
Hinrich
Teague
Zaza
Evans
Damian
Bogans
Mo
Twin
Benson
Rolle
Lighty
Sy
That second group is tough as nails. I saw that Hollinger projection, it means little. What we do know is we have to be tougher in this east. This team is much tougher with Kaman, Evans, Bogans, Mo and Lighty. That with All the other holdovers, we'd be tough.
#9
Posted 02 July 2011 - 10:12 PM
lol JJ is not a disappointment. This trade would be a major one.
#11
Posted 03 July 2011 - 02:24 PM
ATLFORLIFE, on 02 July 2011 - 11:45 PM, said:
Let's get more in return, Lol.
We do need to get out of his contract. The only teams interested in Joe are those who believe Joe is the missing piece. Eith he is the piece to compete for a championship or the piece to get in and deep in the playoffs. That list is small. I imagine the list is Chicago, New York, Portland, Utah or the Clips. I pcked the Clips because of the return. The Clips with Joe at the 3 would be well balanced. Griffith would have three Robins and a shot blocker behind him. We of course would have future financial flexabilty and a very nice center, perimeter blldog and a backup point that can shoot and more. Mo has attitude and fire.
#12
Posted 04 July 2011 - 03:41 PM
Swatguy, on 03 July 2011 - 02:24 PM, said:
We do need to get out of his contract. The only teams interested in Joe are those who believe Joe is the missing piece. Eith he is the piece to compete for a championship or the piece to get in and deep in the playoffs. That list is small. I imagine the list is Chicago, New York, Portland, Utah or the Clips. I pcked the Clips because of the return. The Clips with Joe at the 3 would be well balanced. Griffith would have three Robins and a shot blocker behind him. We of course would have future financial flexabilty and a very nice center, perimeter blldog and a backup point that can shoot and more. Mo has attitude and fire.
Ok, when we only win 31 games, I'll thank you.
#13
#14
Posted 24 July 2011 - 12:27 PM
Vol4ever, on 05 July 2011 - 09:40 AM, said:
Everyone seems to want Kamman but he plays 0 defense. I want another Tree Rollins that can defend, rebound and block shots!
Of the three on your wish list, one is mainly effort and the other two are mainly talents. Having talent is a gift. Kamen can rebound and block shots as well as most, maybe any not named Howard as a center. Defense is mainly effort and he could effort himself into a good defender. Surely with his size he could be a defensive asset in the better scheme.
#15
Posted 24 July 2011 - 08:04 PM
That trade is a good idea. It's beneficial to all 3 teams involved. The Hawks get 3 scrubs, but we wouldn't re-sign Kaman and Bogans so we could enter the Dwight sweepstakes. I wish we wouldn't get Mo, he is a stiff, and a PG, which is the last thing we need. We would want to get rid of him ASAP, so his 2 year contract is tough to swallow. The bad news is this deal would probably take us out of title contention for next year. However, getting rid of Joe and Marvin's contracts would allow us to sign a big time FA, even if it's not Dwight.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















