9-2 without Horf.
#1
Posted 01 February 2012 - 03:44 AM
However, many of us thought that this team would collapse without Horf. That the 2 time allstar was everything. Horf has been replaced by Zaza and we are 9 and freakin 2 without him. If we make it through this hard Feb schedule with a winning record... We really have to start re-evaluating some things.
#2
Posted 01 February 2012 - 05:33 AM
The Hawks have been playing great team defense in part to Josh, Jeff, and JJ.
#3
Posted 01 February 2012 - 07:13 AM
#4
Posted 01 February 2012 - 07:18 AM
#5
Posted 01 February 2012 - 07:59 AM
#6
Posted 01 February 2012 - 08:07 AM
CWebb, on 01 February 2012 - 07:13 AM, said:
MaceCase, on 01 February 2012 - 07:18 AM, said:
#7
Posted 01 February 2012 - 08:11 AM
Randy, on 01 February 2012 - 07:59 AM, said:
Yes
Horf played 6 mins and went down halfway through first quarter
Indy loss may not have happened if horf didn't get injured...he has historically owned that matchup
#8
Posted 01 February 2012 - 08:42 AM
terrell, on 01 February 2012 - 08:07 AM, said:
#9
Posted 01 February 2012 - 08:55 AM
#10
Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:44 AM
It’s funny how the team plays better ball without their "heart and soul" Horford. Kind of reminds me of how the Falcons won more games after dumping the great pile jumper Kieth Brooking.
I don't blame message board people for overrating Al's importance. How can anyone judge him fairly when the media is always telling us how great he is? Again he’s a good player but he does not control whether this team sink or swim.
One thing I've learned is that the Atlanta media plays favorite! If they like the way a guy presents himself then they deem him the quintessential leader (heart and soul) of a team, but what's the truth?.
Truth is Teague and this bench (esp. Zaza) far outweighs anything the hawks could get from Horford. The local media has no clue since they don’t watch the games. They don’t know jack about T-Mac, Willie Green, Radman, and Ivan. This is a good TEAM and one player does not determine their fate!
Edited by NineOhTheRino, 01 February 2012 - 10:00 AM.
#11
Posted 01 February 2012 - 09:58 AM
MaceCase, on 01 February 2012 - 08:42 AM, said:
nbasuperstar40, on 01 February 2012 - 05:33 AM, said:
The Hawks have been playing great team defense in part to Josh, Jeff, and JJ.
#12
#13
Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:12 AM
NineOhTheRino, on 01 February 2012 - 09:44 AM, said:
It’s funny how the team plays better ball without their "heart and soul" Horford. Kind of reminds me of how the Falcons won more games after dumping the great pile jumper Kieth Brooking.
I don't blame message board people for overrating Al's importance. How can anyone judge him fairly when the media is always telling us how great he is? Again he’s a good player but he does not control whether this team sink or swim.
One thing I've learned is that the Atlanta media plays favorite! If they like the way a guy presents himself then they deem him the quintessential leader (heart and soul) of a team, but what's the truth?.
Truth is Teague and this bench (esp. Zaza) far outweighs anything the hawks could get from Horford. The local media has no clue since they don’t watch the games. They don’t know jack about T-Mac, Willie Green, Radman, and Ivan. This is a good TEAM and one player does not determine their fate!
Laughable point about Keith Brooking. Guy is a Ring of Honor nominee in the waiting and was terrific for the Falcons. He played an entire season with a broken back and didn't complain at all about moving from one position to another even though it cost him Pro Bowls and a possible Hall of Fame career. Give me a team of "pile jumpers" like that any day of the week, twice on Sundays.
You seem to have some kind of homer goggles on about Teague. Yes, he's playing ok. That's about it. Ok. This team is winning because of Joe, Josh and the bench play. Teague isn't killing us but saying he's the reason we're winning while in your other posts you are clearly not giving Joe any credit is simply absurd.
#14
Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:12 AM
NineOhTheRino, on 01 February 2012 - 10:03 AM, said:
#15
Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:23 AM
MaceCase, on 01 February 2012 - 10:12 AM, said:
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















