Jump to content

 

- - - - -

Bulls interested in SAR


6 replies to this topic

#1 Boondocks

    6th Man

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 11-September 02
  • Post Count: 844
  • Location: Woot

Posted 21 January 2004 - 09:46 AM

In reply to:



It would take a marquee player to pry Curry from the Bulls, but don't expect Paxson to join the bidding for the Blazers' Rasheed Wallace. If Paxson thought he had a shot at the Los Angeles Lakers' Kobe Bryant, who becomes a free agent this summer, he probably would package Curry in a trade for Wallace, whose contract expires after this season and frees up $17 million.

But the Bulls have been burned before by risking everything on free agency, and it appears the Los Angeles Clippers and Phoenix Suns have a better shot at Bryant.

Then again, Paxson likely would jump at the chance to deal Crawford, Fizer and Antonio Davis for Wallace. The Atlanta Hawks' Shareef Abdur-Rahim is another player on the Bulls' wish list.



http://www.suntimes.com/output/bulls/cst-spt-bull211.html

Hmm, Curry + Crawford + ? for Sar (+?), any biters?

#2 Hotlanta1981

    Head Coach

  • Political Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 26-September 03
  • Post Count: 11,604
  • Gender:Male
  • Location: GA

Posted 21 January 2004 - 09:54 AM

He's a reeses away from a Stanley Roberts or Never Nervious
Pervis. He also doesn't rebound worth a crap. It would cost
them Tyson Chandler at the least.

#3 cyman3

    All-Star

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 10-June 02
  • Post Count: 4,083

Posted 21 January 2004 - 10:21 AM

i rather have Chandler as well

#4 JTFan31

    Starter

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 10-June 02
  • Post Count: 1,175
  • Location: Miami, Florida

Posted 21 January 2004 - 11:02 AM

Most definitely Tyson, but both have their cons.  Like you said Curry is reeses away from being Oliver Miller and Chandler is even more fragile than Theo.  So no way I want to trade Reef, a guy that consistently gets you 20 and 10 season after season that have missed less games than my ten fingers put together for any of those two.

#5 Boondocks

    6th Man

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 11-September 02
  • Post Count: 844
  • Location: Woot

Posted 21 January 2004 - 11:16 AM

Heck I'd rather have Chandler too, but Curry is a C afterall which is the most difficult position to find a good player for.

Anyway I would love a backcourt consisting of JC and Diaw while our upcoming lotto pick could be pf Dwight or fc Emeka..

#6 cyman3

    All-Star

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 10-June 02
  • Post Count: 4,083

Posted 21 January 2004 - 01:36 PM

I think Curry and Boozer would play well next to each other.

#7 KB21

    Assistant Coach

  • Squawkers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Join Date: 10-June 02
  • Post Count: 7,746
  • Location: Tupelo, MS

Posted 21 January 2004 - 04:06 PM

Tyson Chandler has taken the bull by the horns and has worked hard to improve his game.

Eddy Curry has not silenced early critics he had that stated he was a very lazy player who only tried when he had the ball in his hands.

Right now, Eddy Curry is a guy with great size and athleticism but he a very mediocre rebounder and defender.



Reply to this topic



  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users