Brokentree, on 20 August 2010 - 12:02 PM, said:
Can be read as "I have been reading that is some people's opinions we should trade Jamal for a variety of different reasons." The word opin is either short for opinion or opine. Divers is the basically the same as diverse. I had a hard time reading it as well but with minimal effort I think I understood it fine.
As for Jamal. I like the guy on the court and the guy always seems to impress in his interviews. I thought the same thing about Bibby before last year. There just isn't enough money to go around to be able to pay a 6th man that much money. If we could get him to sign on for 3 years 20 million then I'd be ok with it. Anything more in years or money I think is too much. He doesn't have good defense to fall back on as he ages so when he does start to fade offensively its going to hurt his worth that much more. That being said. I rank Horford's contract to be way more of a concern then Jamal's. I believe Horford can only get better where as we can only hope that Jamal doesn't degrade.
I think it's too early to start talking about money. The new CBA has not been drafted. We don't know what it will include so there's no need to try and make decisions based on money.
2nd. We don't know if ASG will find a new partner with big pockets. They are looking.
3rd. To call Jamal a 6th man is really disrespectful. On any other team but Woody's, he's a starter. On Woody's team, we has to justify Marvin being paid starter money.
Right now, Jamal is not that far away from being as good as Joe. It's disrespectful to hear people say " he's just a 6th man" or "what will we do about J Craw 2" etc. JCraw is probably our second best player. I want to see how LD utilizes him.















