Anyone Else In Favour Of Renaming This Site...
#1
Posted 21 January 2004 - 11:58 PM
I mean, honestly, here they go, pull out a win after showing a string of decent games and some heart at the beginning of a stretch featuring mostly home games...and this "essential" site provides nothing...no insight, no breakdown, nuddin...
#2
Posted 22 January 2004 - 07:45 AM
#3
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:05 AM
#4
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:13 AM
Yes, a win is great but the franchise is not going to turned around on a couple of wins.
#5
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:16 AM
Losses are better for this team than wins. Nobody cares that we can beat the bulls. In fact, the Bulls laid down for us too. However, we can manage to put two wins together. That's a problem. We need a new identity. Maybe we can draft for one. Maybe we can trade for one. Whichever way we try to do it, I know that having a lottery pick will help!
#6
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:21 AM
We've won a few games, great. I watch the games and I like seeing them win. But I want the #1 pick and the only way to get close to that goal is to lose.
#7
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:29 AM
#8
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:36 AM
Granted, the team with the worst record doesn't always get teh #1 pick. But we don't have to be the absolute worst team. As long as we're one of the bottom 3, we have an excellent shot at getting a very very good pick, possibly #1.
See, all these random wins are meaningless. They make me happy because i've put a lot of time and money into supporting this team. I like to see them win. But I have zero desire to see us get the crap beat out of us the first half of the season and then pick it up in the 2nd half to finish with 30something wins. It's pointless. I would rather suck bad for one season, draft a potentially great player and see what happens than just kind of suck and finish with 30 wins for the next 10 years with zero fan support.
#9
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:41 AM
#10
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:44 AM
#11
Posted 22 January 2004 - 09:51 AM
TROUBLEMAN
#12
Posted 22 January 2004 - 10:02 AM
#13
Posted 22 January 2004 - 10:07 AM
Cleveland starting tanking in order to get James.
San Antonio tanked a season with Nique to get Duncan.
The only time that tanking hasn't benefited the team was in the case of Chicago (twice) and Boston. The reason being is because Stern didn't want those teams to succeed. However, Atlanta has more potential than those other teams because Atlanta itself is a growing city. It can easily become marketable with the right players... Just think about Vick and how Vickitus has effected the world? The same could happen if the Hawks got the right player.
I know that player is NOT Deng... IS NOT Podkozine(or whatever his name is) and may not be Howard. That player might be playing already... Like Vince Carter. I would think that to get that Russian C and SAR, Toronto would give up oft injured VC and Bosh.
Just a thought... Still, ATL needs somebody with charisma... It may be Josh Smith!
#14
Posted 22 January 2004 - 11:54 AM
SA tanked a whole season because their stars were injured for a whole season. They wouldn't have done that if they had been healthy. If SAR and JT were out for the year or gone I'd say put Nique on the floor again now, but I'm not going whine about slipping in the draft because we're winning games. That takes all the fun out the game.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















