Jump to content

Marvin24Williams

Squawkers
  • Posts

    1,947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Marvin24Williams

  1. Cam is athletic enough to play the 2. Just one hell of a haul for us man
  2. WOJ TWEETED WE GETTING CAM FELLAS LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOO
  3. GUYS WE GET SEKOU OR CAM UNLESS SCHLENK HATES THEM OMG
  4. I believe in Hunter. His offensive game may not have flash but he can do a little bit of everything. Spot ups, dribble drives, catch and shoot, off the dribble pull ups, operating from the post in the mid range. I think a lot of folks are underselling his offensive abilities. He's only going to get better
  5. Forgot to add to my post that White goes to Chicago if Cam or Sekou fall to 10
  6. Cam or Sekou may still be there at 10 fellas Zion Ja Barrett Hunter Culver Garland Hayes if they want a center Sekou or Cam Cam or Sekou
  7. I’m sure Supes was trying to say that Hunter is the Pels pick but they’re exploring trading back to pick him up so they can get another asset along the way
  8. If Sekou is there at 10 I'd just straight up take him. Hayes as well.
  9. If we trade up to 4/5 Culver... maybe Reddish 8. Reddish, Sekou, Hunter 10. Hayes, Sekou, Rui, Goga, Little 17. Keldon, Little, Porter Jr, Langford, Claxton, Bruno, Bol Bol
  10. Didn't this man just say he didn't want to sell picks? Lol
  11. Isn't nbadraft.net usually way off anyway
  12. I wonder if the Wizards would pass on Hunter. I don't mind Hunter with 8 but I'd go Sekou with that pick and get Hunter at 10 instead. Hopefully Wizards are high enough on Little or Hayes to pass on Hunter.
  13. Bulls are misdirecting imo. Even if the Garland stuff is a smokescreen I don't see them taking Reddish over Hunter.
  14. Nice info Supes. I wonder who the Pels are high on.. assuming they keep the pick I can see them passing on Culver. There's some major spacing issues with Ball, Ingram, Zion & now Culver. Garland to 4 seems to be picking up some steam for the Pels but I still think they select Hunter. Which leaves Culver to the Cavs (unless they're really low on Sexton as a PG) and paves way for Garland & White landing Phoenix & Chicago with leaves us with Reddish. Wishful thinking of course but I hope this scenario plays out.
  15. He's one of my guys at 17 if we keep it.
  16. Still hoping we get Culver or Cam but i'm fine if they're not there and we just take Sekou at 8. Not a fan of Little at all but maybe he pans out so picking him at 10 doesn't sound too bad. Then just take one of Fernando, Claxton, Goga, Kabengele.. whoever is left of them.
  17. found this on reddit, it's from Givony's latest article
  18. Yeah, i'm fine with 8+17, or 10+17. No way am I giving up both 8 and 10 for 4 tho. I'd do 10+17 for the Cavs pick as well if they bite on it.
  19. Apparently we are one of the teams interested in Pels #4. I think they trade back when all is said and done.
  20. Hmm a center in the top 4 seems like a reach, perhaps they trade back with us, Chicago, or Phoenix?
  21. Wow, so Ball Holiday Ingram Zion ??? I think they pick Hunter with #4. Gives them a small ball lineup that they can run and gun with, which is when Lonzo is at his best.
  22. Well if that LAL/CHI/NOP trade goes through we can all say bye to drafting Culver & to a lesser extent Cam or Hunter. Culver will go 4, Cam will most likely go 5 & Hunter 7. A trade up is going to be mandatory if we want Cam or Hunter
  23. I mean it net's us Culver or Cam but I really hope we're not trading 8+10+17 for 4. It'd be nice to at least get 2 rookies in the top 20.
  24. I'm officially on team Culver. Let's get that trade done Schlenk
×
×
  • Create New...