jpierrek Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djcorley Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Marvin will be a better player in the long run then Paul...Bigs always take a little more time to develop.. That being said...we should have taken Iguoudala(spelling?) instead of Childress...that dude is a Stud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Quote: Marvin will be a better player in the long run then Paul...Bigs always take a little more time to develop.. That being said...we should have taken Iguoudala(spelling?) instead of Childress...that dude is a Stud! I think people forget that Paul is still very young himself - he came out after his sophmore year, which for a point guard is pretty impressive. As for Marvin being a better player in the long run then Paul, you may be right, but I wonder if the fact that Paul will make the players around him better doesn't substantially mitigate that fact. Food for thought. Obviously it will be another two years before we know for sure, but right now the absence of a point guard and the rudderless nature of this team is telling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpierrek Posted November 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 thank you for your votes: the winner for the line up we should of gotten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now