exodus Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Just curious if you guys would do this trade. Denver is probably shopping either Watson or Miller and we have already covered a Miller trade. Denver needs a shooter and they have a big pg in Miller to play Salim at the 2. Watson is a very tough defender at the point and likes to push the ball, although he isn't a shooter and is a little turnover prone. I am undecided. Plus Watson is a base year player, and to be honest I don't even know what the rules are trading base year players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 LOL @ Ex. Offering to trade Salim for Watson, on a team that already struggles mightily to score? How about trading Lue for Watson, and we keep Salim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 5, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Denver is looking for a 3pt shooter and Salim fits the bill. Everyone here seems to think Lue can't play the point. I guess they must not be too impressed with Watson either. Denver seems to be the only team that has a pg to trade and they need shooting. If they would take Lue for Watson that would be fine but I don't see that happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Vol4ever Posted December 5, 2005 Premium Member Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 are you outta your mind???? Salim for Watson??? Watson is sitting on the pine. Salim has the outside shooting ability that the hawks have never had. No Salimn isn't going anywhere unless that idiot of a GM we have is on crack! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornandDieHawks Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 To include Salim in a trade we have to getting a bonafide star in return. Salim is our best perimeter shooter coming off the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duff_Man Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Yeah what an awesome trade idea. I say do it. Matter of fact, trade Marvin, too. And I am sure we can get rid of Al and Lue as well. Then we fire Woody and promote Nique to coach. Then we can finally have a winless season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 5, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 If you guys think the Hawks have any chance to get a quality pg by trading Harrington or Childress you need a serious reality check. Most of the trades I have seen posted on here are ridiculously homerific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrawDaddy Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Salim ain't going anywhere man. And if he does, I'll never walk into Phillips Arena again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duff_Man Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Quote: If you guys think the Hawks have any chance to get a quality pg by trading Harrington or Childress you need a serious reality check. Most of the trades I have seen posted on here are ridiculously homerific. Or completely retarded...like Salim for Earl Watson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adhawk33 Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 No. Not much more needs to be said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumpshot Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 I think us and Denver are a good match for a trade. I would trade Salim, Childress and Harrington for Nene / Miller. That would solve some of our position problems and give us some more veterans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iman Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Exodus, I agree, that is a good theoretical trade proposal. I'm with the other guys, I wouldnt do it but you are right, it's not gonna be easy to just pick up a good point. I think Salim fits well in the backcourt with JJ to finish off games. Add Marvin, JSmoove, and ZaZa and that's how I want us to close out games the rest of the year. I'd still like to see us pick up a good running point guard to start and to get us easy baskets during the game. We'll probably have to draft Rondo to get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 3 core pieces for 1 that is not long-term pg and 1 that is all-potential and has already been injured a lot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumpshot Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 I think Miller would be the best PG we had since Mookie. We need an another PF / C and he is better than anyone we have now anyway. I don't think Childress is a core piece and Harrington is a free agent to be. Salim may be the only one we should not trade, but it takes talent to receive talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 6, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 You guys are missing the point i believe. Nobody has even touched on it. Granted this is not a no brainer trade but it is a much better trade than you guys seem to think. The reason goes back to a question: What is more important in basketball, offense or defense? The answer is defense, for a very simple reason. Even the best offensive players/teams blow hot and cold. That is the nature of shooting. Even the best shooters have days when they can't buy a bucket, and usually it affects the shooting of the rest of the team. Defense is different. A strong defender is generally a strong defender night in and night out. Some days a player may be tired or less motivated than others but overall their defensive performance will be much more consistent than the performance of a good offensive player. How many off nights do Ben Wallace and Bruce Bowen have on D? If you combine their off nights and add them up for a year they won't equal the number of off shooting nights guys like Ray Allen or Kobe Bryant have in a month. Earl Watson is one of the best defenders in the game at the point position. Salim is a scorer off the bench. Which will be more valuable night in and night out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Quote: You guys are missing the point i believe. Nobody has even touched on it. Granted this is not a no brainer trade but it is a much better trade than you guys seem to think. The reason goes back to a question: What is more important in basketball, offense or defense? The answer is defense, for a very simple reason. Even the best offensive players/teams blow hot and cold. That is the nature of shooting. Even the best shooters have days when they can't buy a bucket, and usually it affects the shooting of the rest of the team. Defense is different. A strong defender is generally a strong defender night in and night out. Some days a player may be tired or less motivated than others but overall their defensive performance will be much more consistent than the performance of a good offensive player. How many off nights do Ben Wallace and Bruce Bowen have on D? If you combine their off nights and add them up for a year they won't equal the number of off shooting nights guys like Ray Allen or Kobe Bryant have in a month. Earl Watson is one of the best defenders in the game at the point position. Salim is a scorer off the bench. Which will be more valuable night in and night out? LOL . . actually . . Salim as a scoring threat is much more needed for the Hawks than Watson as a defender. If Watson comes here, he's going to have to provide points as well as his defense. Because we'll still not be able to stop people on the interior, it will be important for us to still put points on the board. Part of the problem with the Hawks, is that they go through long scoring droughts ( 3 + minutes at a time ) in which the game usually gets out of hand. It's not the other team's PGs that are usually torching us on offense, it's the forwards and centers. Salim isn't a horrible defender like Lue, but he isn't Earl Watson on defense either. Once Harrington is dealt, we're going to need someone to score on this team outside of JJ. Salim may be forced to be that guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 6, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Quote: LOL . . actually . . Salim as a scoring threat is much more needed for the Hawks than Watson as a defender Not really. The last I checked the Hawks were second to last in fg% defense. They have guys who can shoot they just aren't hitting so far. Defensively every position plays a role. The Hawks ALWAYS get killed by teams with a quick backcourt. Last year the Wizards and the Bulls owned them for this reason. JJ is a good defender and adding Watson would make them one of the best defensive backcourts in the league. The Hawks D will improve if Harrington gets dealt. Then Smith will move to the 4 and Marvin would start at the 3. Then after the season they could sign Przybilla and they would be a good defensive team. There are so many quick, penetrating point guards in the league and the Hawks have nobody that can handle them. Salim is not a great all around offensive player. He doesn't have the size or moves that Gordon has to free himself for a shot. He struggles against taller players and also has trouble finishing at the rim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 6, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 Thx for the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted December 6, 2005 Report Share Posted December 6, 2005 one of the few bright spots and you want to trade him for someone worse. gross i would be sick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now