1524 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 Tonight, I finally got a good look at Rajon Rondo aginst Georgia on ESPN, and let me say I came away very impressed with him to say the least. He could provide some great defense, energy, athleticisum, and smart play...all things that our young Hawks need. But if we drafted him that would give us 3 smaller gaurds, which is too many in my oppinion. So who to put on the trade market? Rajon Rondo, Tyronn Lue, or Salim Stoudamire? I think that decision is easy...T-Lue. Now, I happen to like Ty Lue alot as a player, and as a veturan leader, but out of those three guys, he would be the weakest link in the future, and would have the most trade value now. Another confict, at this point we look like we may be holding the top pick in this years draft, and while Rondo is going to be a hell of a player in this league, he isn't 1st overall pick worthy. So in my mind, the best thing for BK to do is trade down for multiple picks, one of which, we take Rondo. Bottom line, this kid is going to be special, and I hope he can shine in the NBA as an Atlanta Hawk!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 Lue has no trade value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 He looked great against Georgia but he sure has looked pretty pedestrian against other teams here recently (like Alabama). I've seen some good things but often bad decision making. IMHO decision making is more important than a wide wingspan for PGs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 Rondo is very, very good. If he had a consistent jumper, he'd be the best point guard prospect to come out of college in the past 10 years, if not the past 15 years. That's the only weakness I see in Rondo's game. The guy can penetrate and get into the lane on anyone. He does a fabulous job of locating his open teammates. He's a great on the ball defender. He's got extremely long arms, and his quickness is unmatched at the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted January 18, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 I love Rondo but KB is hyping him way too much, IMO. He is very good but has struggled with some of his decisionmaking this season as well as his leadership skills. This season has actually been a disappointment for him so far and UK fans are feeling more and more like he will probably return for his junior year (not that I think they are necessarily right about that). He is a good passer and outstanding ball-hawk type defender. As a one on one defender he is not as good as he should be but with his length and quickness and leaping ability he will develop in that regard. His major limitation is his terrible jump shot. He absolutely cannot stretch a defense but that would be OK on this team with JJ and Salim as potential backcourt mates. He is a very good penetrator and would do a much better job creating for his teammates than Lue, IMO. He also would benefit from JJ's ability to run the point since some of his best games are when Patrick Sparks takes on more ballhandling responsibilities (because he is trying to do everything otherwise) like at the UGA game last night. I would love to see him end up on the Hawks but he won't be an instant savior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 Quote: If he had a consistent jumper, he'd be the best point guard prospect to come out of college in the past 10 years, if not the past 15 years. What?????? That's ridiculous. He might be a consistent jumper from being a great PG prospect, but that would only put him close to or on the same level as the Pauls, Feltons, D. Williams, J. Jacks, Telfairs and Livingstons of the world. He's lightyears away from being classified as a better prospect than those guys, and that's just out of the last two draft classes. He's good and has potential, but he's got a lot to prove. This season has been a disaster for his draft status, because he hasn't shown that he can be a leader yet. What good is a PG prospect if he can't lead his team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 Rondo had 1 assist and 9 pts in a loss to that vaunted bball powerhouse Vanderbilt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pathway23 Posted January 18, 2006 Report Share Posted January 18, 2006 I'm now convinced that KB21 has become the anti-Diesel, and that is NOT a good thing! KB21 is the antithesis of Diesel, perhaps the synthesis of Diesel and KB21 would be Hawksquawk's best poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted January 19, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Quote: that would only put him close to or on the same level as the Pauls, Feltons, D. Williams, J. Jacks, Telfairs and Livingstons of the world. Even without a consistent jumper I'd take Rondo over Jack, Felton or Telfair at this point. He is not in the same class as Paul or D. Williams coming out of college and doesn't have the same potential as Livingston, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DominiqueWilkins Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Your right or teams would have pursued him stronger when he was a free agent this past off-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 if he's the BEST defender at the PG position in the draft then that's who the Hawks should draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted January 19, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Quote: Your right or teams would have pursued him stronger when he was a free agent this past off-season. We got Stephen Jackson because other teams did not pursue him strongly in the off-season and traded him for Al Harrington. I'm not saying Lue has that kind of value (he doesn't) but I wouldn't write him off as a guy another team would be interested in acquiring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Quote: Quote: Your right or teams would have pursued him stronger when he was a free agent this past off-season. We got Stephen Jackson because other teams did not pursue him strongly in the off-season and traded him for Al Harrington. I'm not saying Lue has that kind of value (he doesn't) but I wouldn't write him off as a guy another team would be interested in acquiring. I would. Al and Jackson were both acquired with the idea that they would be starters. Anyone acquiring Lue is acquiring him with the idea he will be a back-up, at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Everyone knows that Lue is made to be a backup. That does not mean that he is worthless. He and Bobby Jackson are 2 of the best backup PG's in the league. You could get something in return. Maybe not a starter, but something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Quote: Anyone acquiring Lue is acquiring him with the idea he will be a back-up, at best. No actually the Lakers were pursuing him in the offseason but he chose to stay here. You may not like it but the simple fact is that Lue is the best 3pt shooter and best ball handler on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 lue is not the best 3pt shooter on the team slim/jj are better (and al if u believe diesel) he's not the best ball handler either, but he's better at 'not turning it over' than jj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 he's not our best 3 pt shooter. He is our best ballhandler but really his only competition is royal ivey. As far as starting , he turned down LA exactly because he wanted to come off the bench here. Even he knows he should be a backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Lue is shooting 47% from 3 on the season and 38% for his career, better than anyone on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 For starters, there is no way you can convince me (and I highly doubt anyone else on here) that Lue is a better 3 point shooter than Salim. He has a higher percentage because he only takes 3 pt shots when he is wide open whereas Salim comes into the games having to gun it, with most of his threes being contested. Higher percentage does not mean better shooter. Childress has hit 12/23 3 points this year for .522, but I doubt you think he is our best 3 pt shooter. Or do you? Rip Hamilton is hitting a higher 3 pt percentage than Redd this year, but he is not a better 3 pt shooter. Stop focusing on stats so much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Quote: Everyone knows that Lue is made to be a backup. That does not mean that he is worthless. He and Bobby Jackson are 2 of the best backup PG's in the league. You could get something in return. Maybe not a starter, but something. There are a lot of other back-up point guards in this league that I rather have, from young guys (Jack, Felton, Devin Harris, Livingston, Mo Williams, Udrith, Calderon, Barbosa, Blake, Head, Duhon, etc.) to old guys (Claxton, Daniels, Jackson, Tinsley, Snow, McInnis, Arroyo, Watson, Boykins, etc.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now