y2kenta Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 IND is falling and fading fast, and they are more ready to move Artest than ever. They are losing games in bunches (esp. tonight, losing by 30) and the time for us to take advantage of the Artest saga is NOW!!! ATL should really push for one of the following deals: 1. Al (to IND) + Delk (to DEN) | Artest (to DEN) | A. Miller (to ATL) 2. Al (to IND) + Lue (to LAL) | Artest (to LAL) | Odom or Mihm/ George (to ATL) DEN - is hot for Artest and could use his perimeter defense and they could maybe part with Dre and accept Delk. LAL - has nothing to really offer IND, but we can offer LAL a veteran PG (who's played in LA under Phil). Artest has also been rumored to have bought a house in LA. IND - see above ATL - we are desperate and we must get something in return for AL to make up for the last 2 years of trading expiring contracts for next to nothing. Though Andre Miller or Odom would be "off the meter" good for us, Mihm would be a good fit, because he's more aggressive now, he blocks shots, and rebounds well. Keep in mind, AL only wanted to leave IND to get a starting spot and now with Artest leaving, he'd start in IND. I think either of the deals above would really improve our team overall and helps us win consistently now, while staying young. Either of these lineups would make us a whole lot better and get us way more wins than our current lineup: 1. Zaza / Odom / Smoove / JJ / Salim - (3 ball handlers + more shots available for Salim (who's ready) to start + Odom is the 2nd most "versatile" PF in the game [behind Garnett]) 2. Zaza / Smoove / Marvin / JJ / Andre - (we'd finally fill our PG void in a big way + Andre is a pass first PG that would get the ball to JJ like Nash did + Andre would get our tempo up and allow that young horses to run and gun) 3. Mihm / Smoove / George or Marvin / JJ / Salim - (Mihm and Smoove would definately improve our interior defense with our starters + Guys will look to free up/ get the ball to Salim alot more + Zaza could still get starter minutes or could maybe even start with Mihm - ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 The only deal that remotely comes close to giving us the proper value for Al Harrington is the deal that would have us getting Lamar Odom. Outside of that, I wouldn't trade Al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted January 25, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 I definitely think Artest is going to the Lakers, but I think they know now they don't have to give up anyone near as good as Odom to get him. Odom is the only trade I'd be interested in. I don't think Denver is giving up Miller and it wouldn't make much sense for us to give up Al without getting a big man in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 immediately. That would be TERRIBLE! What has Devean George EVER done other than ride the coat tails of Shaq and Kobe? He is absolutely worthless to this team because I'd MUCH rather have Marvin, Chillz, Smoove, JJ or Salim on the floor at any position he might be asked to play. As for Mihm, he is a solid big man but nothing special and certainly not worth a guy the caliber of Al Harrington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 agreed. There is a HUUUUUGE difference between Odom and George/Mihm. Odom would be a tremendous addition although his contract scares me. George is virtually a non-factor and Mihm is nothing more than a backup, much like zaza. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted January 25, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 why not try to get Smush in the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 I think Odom is a better rebounder, ballhandler and passer and Al is a better offensive player. Defensively, neither is great but I'd probably give a slight edge to Odom. Overall, I'd give a slight talent edge to Odom but I think Al will come cheaper than Odom. Also, historically, Al has displayed better character and a better attitude. The question then becomes is Odom worth the extra $1.5M to $3M a season more that he would likely make? I say MAYBE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 i don't want odom...makes too much and won't help us contend, just like al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Smush is crap as well. No need for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 I think Odom would be much better for us. If BK really thinks he will make this thing work without a PG, with players that are versatile enough to do it all, then Odom is your man. He will not hog the ball and greatly help with our distribution, particularly from the post. He is roughly as good a scorer as Al, but the offense does not grind to a halt like it does when Al gets it. I think Odom's character issues were a long, long time ago. I'm over that. I would be very concerned with his contract though. If you have Odom and JJ making huge bucks, you can't add much else. We'd pretty much be rolling with ?-JJ-Marvin-Odom-C from the draft as our future. I think dumping it to Odom in the post will lead to a lot more points for our young slashers than dumping it to Al in the post. That being said I think that the odds of this happening are close to zero, but it's an interesting debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 him could open up some interesting things. For instance, in the off season, would Toronto consider dealing Bosh for Smoove (or Marvin)/#1 overall? Zaza/Edwards Bosh/Marvin (or Smoove) Odom/Chillz JJ/Salim Speedy Claxton???/Lue or BK's wet dream: Bosh Odom Marvin (or Smoove) Chillz JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Quote: him could open up some interesting things. For instance, in the off season, would Toronto consider dealing Bosh for Smoove (or Marvin)/#1 overall? No chance at all unless they know for sure that Bosh plans to bolt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 The income tax situation alone for Raptors' players is enough to make a guy consider leaving and when you look at the state of their franchise, they have to know he could leave. Toronto could do a lot worse than Aldridge/Smoove for Bosh. Aldridge/Villanueva/Smoove (or Marvin) could be a very good frontcourt for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now