KB21 Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Please. It would be an absolute joke to take Shelden Williams with a top three pick. I swear, sometimes I wonder if some of you would rather go back to the days of Pete Babcock drafting, where we ignored talent to go for the guy who can make the more immediate impact yet has a limited upside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 That is a mischaracterization of the Babcock era. None of his picks had an immediate impact, so you can't say he picked immediate impact over long term potential. Granted his picks lacked long term potential as well, but they certaintly did not make an immediate impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VDiLetto Posted February 14, 2006 Report Share Posted February 14, 2006 Remember Priest Lauderdale? I had so much hope for him. Dude was like 7'4" and 370. I would take that over John Edwards right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now