Premium Member Diesel Posted April 10, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 PF or C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Can't really answer this because it depends in large measure on who the specific player they bring in is. Basically what I want to see is a good front court. I think the biggest need a defensive minded big with some semblance of a low post game on offense. Whether that individual is a center or power forward is a secondary concern. A lot really depends on the coaching staff and front office. If they think Marvin and Smoove together work as the starting forwards, then I think we desparately need a big man at center. If the front office sees Smoove and Marvin as small forwards and only part time power forwards, then we need a power forward ASAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted April 10, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 I agree. I think if we bring in a PF who plays good defense and good help defense that Zaza suffices as C. For instance, in the draft, LaMarcus Aldrige wouldn't be a bad pick if he could come in right away and play PF and be a dominant defensive force. The same is somewhat true for Tyrus Thomas. I think he'd be good help defense but I wonder if he could handle the likes of Rasheed Wallace and other big PFs. I just don't think that there's much better in the way of Centers that we can get either in the draft, FAcy, or trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Longterm...if we are really going to compete in the paint (meaning be at least pretty good)...I think we need both. Zaza was a nice pickup but not a banger. A PF/Zaza combination would be better, but not the whole answer, IMHO. However, since we can't realistically get both, I would vote for the PF now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Walter Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 We only have two positions filled, Sg and Sf. That's horrible when you consider our used draft capitol (3 lottery picks including next year's traded away, 17th pick, a likely 18-20th pick traded, and a 21st pick in Diaw traded.). BK better step up this offseason because he traded away the next one and the following one may begin the young player exodus from the Hawks if we do not become winners. My take? 1) We need only a center I-F We get a dominate 2-way center and play JS and MW at the 4 and 3 respectively...WON'T HAPPEN!!! 2) ...otherwise we need both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Walter Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 I like the Patrick O'Bryant kid. Barnani and Obryant would make me very happy. If Obryant is worth it he'll at least be in the lottery. Al Harrington trade to Minny for their 10th pick? Lineup (with 2, 7'ers)? O'Bryant Bargnani Josh Smith/MW JJ/Childress ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 we don't need a pf at all...we have Smoove we do need a defensive rebounding center to pair with zaza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted April 10, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 and the combination of a dominant PF?? For instance and this is some hyperboyle but to prove my point. If we could somehow trade for KG... Don't you think that Zaza would be a sufficient C alongside KG as PF... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 We can't trade Al for a pick unless its after the draft..Al would have to have an under the table agreement to play with Minny, and they would have to draft for us..Sounds too complicated to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted April 10, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Smoove has done nothing that PFs do except rebound and I think he does that less against dominant PFs.. Washington 8 rebs Memphis 7 rebs Indiana 7 rebs Dallas 4 rebs Detroit 7 rebs Knicks 4 rebs Knicks 7 rebs Heat 4 rebs Jazz 6 rebs When you're talking about a PF, he has to be able to rebound. If you really watch Smoove, he doesn't clear out space for the rebound. I don't honestly know if he has a low post technique for rebounding other than jump up fast to get it. That works until you get bodied out of position and just beat to where the ball is going to be. That's what good rebounders do and it seems like that's what they do to Smoove. Moreover, we take away every advantage that he has by making him something that he's not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 against KG. I guess KG isn't "elite" enough for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Quote: Smoove has done nothing that PFs do except rebound and I think he does that less against dominant PFs.. Washington 8 rebs Memphis 7 rebs Indiana 7 rebs Dallas 4 rebs Detroit 7 rebs Knicks 4 rebs Knicks 7 rebs Heat 4 rebs Jazz 6 rebs When you're talking about a PF, he has to be able to rebound. If you really watch Smoove, he doesn't clear out space for the rebound. I don't honestly know if he has a low post technique for rebounding other than jump up fast to get it. That works until you get bodied out of position and just beat to where the ball is going to be. That's what good rebounders do and it seems like that's what they do to Smoove. Moreover, we take away every advantage that he has by making him something that he's not. You also have to consider that he probably loses 3 or 4 rebounds a game by not being able to get offensive boards because we play him a lot on the perimeter, instead of the paint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joannes3000 Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Center. If Detroit let's Wallace walk and we grab him, watch what happens. Let Smoove and Al/Marvin play defense at the 4 and 3 respectively with Wallace in the middle. Game over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Center Diesel, no brainer. We have the weakest post defense in the game and the center position is hands down the hardest to fill, much harder than PG which is the 2nd toughest. If we do not get a center in this draft or during the off season this year or next, it could very well set our developement (rebuilding) back three years as a team....We have got to aquire a solid defensive minded center; end of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Even if Zaza is a starter quality C, we still need quality depth at both positions. Just look at our division rivals' rotations: MIA - Shaq/Haslem/Zo ORL - Howard/Darko/Battie CHA - Okafor/Brezec/May Then us - Zaza/Al/Smoove Compared to our division rivals, we are VASTLY undersized. Both Al and Smoove are AT LEAST as much SF as PF and neither is a Center. I think we need to add a QUALITY 4/5 in the draft (my preference is Aldridge at this point) AND a 4/5 via free agency or trade (my preference is Nene at this point). Anything less and we will struggle again. I feel that: Nene/Aldridge/Zaza is somewhat realistic and allows us to at least compete with the big boys in our division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Agreed. Assuming we lose Al, draft + offseason needs to get us two bigs (4/5) and one PG IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Honestly, I would PREFER to see us trade the #1 pick because I don't want to see us get younger but if we keep it, we need to go big. As for Al, sign and trade him for a big (preferable) unless he will come back for a reasonable amount of money. Even if he does come back, sign a big in free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Vol4ever Posted April 13, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted April 13, 2006 come in and be a defesive force? I watched several Texas games this year and he seems to have talent but was quit passsive IMO. Only time will tell but right now I am not such an Aldridge fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 13, 2006 Report Share Posted April 13, 2006 The problem is the alternatives aren't any better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Walter Posted April 13, 2006 Report Share Posted April 13, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now