Premium Member Diesel Posted May 6, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Aside from just wanting somebody new... What exactly is wrong with Lue/JJ? I know they started off ruff.. But after JJ got into Sync... He and Lue wasn't so bad. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind draft Roy if that's what it came down to, but I don't think that Looking for a high priced FA PG is what we are going to do and I'm wondering if it's even neccessary. Lue would have led the league in 3pters if he had played enough games to qualify. Our offense did a good job of scoring points. Our main problem was defense. Of course, there were some times when it would have been better to be 100% effecient on offense, but Why propose spending lots of money to bring in a big time PG... Is this remorse for not picking Paul? Bring on Aldridge or Shelden Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 To ask a question that you usually ask..Do you ever watch a game? Did you not see opposing point guards drive freely to the basket to either get an easy shot or dish?..On the ball defense is the biggest thing this team lacks..Lue cannot stop dribble penetration..Lue does handle the ball ok if you enjoy watching him dribble, and he has a decent shot..The bottom line is that Lue is a backup, no more or less..We have to have a point that can cut down on our turnovers, hit the open shot, and most importantly be able to play defense.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Quote: To ask a question that you usually ask..Do you ever watch a game? Did you not see opposing point guards drive freely to the basket to either get an easy shot or dish?..On the ball defense is the biggest thing this team lacks..Lue cannot stop dribble penetration..Lue does handle the ball ok if you enjoy watching him dribble, and he has a decent shot..The bottom line is that Lue is a backup, no more or less..We have to have a point that can cut down on our turnovers, hit the open shot, and most importantly be able to play defense.. I think getting big men is a bigger need before look for PG's. The Hawks aren't building a team that will be extremely talented on the offensive end, and that horrible 102PPG has got to come down to atleast 98PPG next year if the Hawks are to make anymore improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 We need both, but I know it wasn't pf's and centers that killed us in the paint..It was pointguards and shooting guards roaming freely in the paint that killed us inside.. I agree both Zaza and Al are poor defenders, but very few bigmen can handle 1's, 2's, and 3's when they drive freely into the paint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Quote: We need both, but I know it wasn't pf's and centers that killed us in the paint..It was pointguards and shooting guards roaming freely in the paint that killed us inside.. I agree both Zaza and Al are poor defenders, but very few bigmen can handle 1's, 2's, and 3's when they drive freely into the paint. It helps to be able to clog the middle. I believe it also makes it easier on the guards to play defense when you know there are guys back there that can protect the paint. I believe defense really starts from the inside... Notice how Dallas improved on defense with the additions of Damp and Diop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 I think we should try to get Flip to start with JJ, and bring Lue off the bench....playoff teams usually have quality depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted May 6, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Yeah, I watch.. And I believe that if we had a true Big man in the lane, they would be less prone to drive. If we want to place blame on the guards, then JJ should get his share too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 I agree..Thats the one area I was a little disapointed in JJ..His defense was nothing special at the 2 and downright poor at the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 I think Lue is an average back-up point guard, nothing more. The Hawks definitely need an upgrade. I think a good defensive big man is a more pressing need but point guard is a close second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted May 8, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 I like this post. I agree totally. In fact Lue should have gone back to starting in my opinion. This is why BK doesn't see the need for a point because he doesn't see anyone significantly better than Lue available. This is also why I think BK passed on Chris Paul. Sure its laughable now but he obviously didn't think Paul would be significantly better than Lue right off bat. I'm sure he knew Paul would be a great player eventually but I'm sure he still thinks Marvin will be a better player in the long run. Lue isn't great defensively but its not for lack of effort. And he brings some good clutch play with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted May 8, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 I won't disagree.. I just don't see the need to go out and spend lots of money on a player that's not much better than Lue. For what it's worth, I would probably rather keep the 2nd round experimentation to find a PG going instead of investing a lot of FAcy money on some of these contract players... That is of course, unless the first round yields us Roy with no power players in sight. There's something special about Roy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 If the Hawks bring in a young big man then I think a veteran point guard would be a tremendous asset for all the young players on the team. I am not sure who that veteran is, I think Cassell is good but a little too old for our purposes. Best fit is speedy Claxton, he is not perfect but has good experience and has performed well under pressure (he was very good when with SA). He would not command huge minutes (and hopefully not huge dollars) but would be available for 25-30 minutes a game to stabilize the team offensively and more importantly defensively. Outside of Speedy, I don't see any good options, which only compounds the Hawks problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 we aren't going ANYWHERE with lue as our main pg now, if u wanna argue a jj/chill backcourt, then there is something to debate...but a lue/jj backcourt isn't doing [censored] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Truth be told we only went for our ideal starting lineup first, which was JJ Chills Smoove Harrington Zaza Then we lost the first game, Woody panicked and changed the lineup and put Lue in at Pg. Then Al got hurt and they decided that we needed Lue's scoring off of the bench so we put Ivey in and the rest is history. But isn't it ironic that in the last part of the season, it is the above lineup that we used more than anything. Instead of Lue or Marvin being the first player off of the bench, it was Chills for Ivey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Quote: Then we lost the first game, Woody panicked and changed the lineup and put Lue in at Pg. To be honest I doubt that's what happenned. My guess is Woody never really accepted JJ as a PG. He had to start him there for a game just so BK didn't look like a liar, then he went back to his plan. Woody had to have figured out what JJ could and couldn't do in preseason and practice etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted May 8, 2006 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 What's the damn difference... We're using Chillz as a 6th man OG? How can we be going somewhere with Chillz/JJ/Lue.. But not be going anywhere with Lue/JJ/Chillz?? Especially, when the minutes are spread about about equally??? I'm Laughing out Loud over Here Nick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudderfudder77 Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Quote: Yeah, I watch.. And I believe that if we had a true Big man in the lane, they would be less prone to drive. If we want to place blame on the guards, then JJ should get his share too. Usually I disagree with Diesel on principle, but I regretfully have to agree with him on this issue. It makes the guards jobs that much mre difficult knowing that there is no big man to protect them if their guy gets in the lane. Chicago for example - when Chandler is playing well and is active they are one of the toughest defenses to face, when he goes in the crapper (around 50 games a season) they become a fair to decent defense - even with Duhon and Hinrichs defense on the perimeter and Nocioni flopping around the lane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 I would loved to have seen that lineup in a triangle offense...ZZ is not a bad passer....JJ and Chills would have thrived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Backourt is only set if Salim Stoudamire learns how to play the point including D. WOuld be nice if Salim could be a poor man's Arenas. But anyways, I don't think we're set but we could live with our current backcourt. It's our frontcourt that needs help the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeti Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 The truth is ... Lue is just too ugly to watch. Plays fine but but he ought to wear a bag over his head. Even my dog puckers up when Lue is on TV. Actually, I agree he didn't play so bad. And we won't get anyone better in FAcy. But I'd rather take a chance on Roy if Bargnani, Aldridge, and Splitter are gone. If we get one of those three, I'll put up with Lue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now