exodus Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Back in March this is what Diesel was saying about Shelden Quote: I think today was typical. A 6'9 C vs. a bigger stronger body and Williams for Duke folded like a chair. What did he get 3 rebounds? Eric Williams had his way. I don't think anybody from Duke is worthy of a lottery pick. Quote: I would prefer Smith's 6'7" and knowinig how to play in the post as a second round pick than to waste a pick on Williams in the first round. Quote: Smith (a 6'7" 2nd round prospect) still looked better than Williams. And lets not talk about how EWilliams had his way with the Landlord. I have never seen a landlord get evicted out of his own place the way that Ewilliams kicked him out. shelden So why has he changed his tune? After all Shelden hasn't played for months. The reason is simple. It just gives Diesel another excuse to bash Marvin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joannes3000 Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 You are absolutely right. I was thinking the exact samething myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deester11 Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 WOW. Did you read the draftexpress draft article on the Hawks? They don't think Shelden is worth five either. I really don't want Shelden in a Hawks uni! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Quote: WOW. Did you read the draftexpress draft article on the Hawks? They don't think Shelden is worth five either. I really don't want Shelden in a Hawks uni! the guy that wrote that is a fan just like us. it's just his opinion, even though his opinion is probably more accurate that 99% of ours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 is their are more replies on a post bashing Diesel for being a hypocrite (not that i argue with that) than a post with an article that very fairly assesses the Hawks' strengths, weaknesses, needs. do they actually talk basketball on other forums such as RealGM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted June 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Time for a recount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted June 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Quote: is their are more replies on a post bashing Diesel for being a hypocrite (not that i argue with that) than a post with an article that very fairly assesses the Hawks' strengths, weaknesses, needs. I just realized that you posted your article at midnight last night. did you really expect a ton of responses on a saturday morning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted June 18, 2006 Report Share Posted June 18, 2006 Quote: Quote: is their are more replies on a post bashing Diesel for being a hypocrite (not that i argue with that) than a post with an article that very fairly assesses the Hawks' strengths, weaknesses, needs. I just realized that you posted your article at midnight last night. did you really expect a ton of responses on a saturday morning? i see what you're saying. i'm just talking about the "climate" around these parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now