tmac13 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 The more I would love to have him..He is a rebounding machine..He has averaged 9 rebounds in less that 30 minutes the last 2 seasons..He has grabbed 18 rebounds in a game 4 times in his career..When you have a team a jumpshooters like we do, you need a bigman that can board..I would love to have Foster.. Foster, Yessircabbages, and a protected 1st for AL..Thats the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: The more I would love to have him..He is a rebounding machine..He has averaged 9 rebounds in less that 30 minutes the last 2 seasons..He has grabbed 18 rebounds in a game 4 times in his career..When you have a team a jumpshooters like we do, you need a bigman that can board..I would love to have Foster.. Foster, Yessircabbages, and a protected 1st for AL..Thats the deal. Plus his contract is favorable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final_quest Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 I would be satisfied with a deal like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 I agree. The guy averages somewhere around 17.3 rebounds per 48 minutes, and he's quick enough to guard power forwards. A lot of Indiana fans don't think Larry will deal Jasekivicious. They say that Larry has a problem admitting that he made a mistake, and he is going to force Jasekivicious down their throats. Something like Jeff Foster, Anthony Johnson, and a first may be the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 If you don't bring a name back for Al, people will riot in the streets. We might as well do the reported Lakers deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 I don't really care what "people" think about the deal. The Hawks will do what makes sense for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Doesn't make sense either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 What doesn't make sense? Getting a great rebounding big man in Jeff Foster that has a very manageable deal plus a first round pick? Oh, so it makes more sense to wreck your salary cap by adding Allen Iverson or Steve "The Franchise Killer" Francis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Mainly because if you want to be a run and gun team, it all starts with the rebound. Foster, Johnson, 1st... gets it done for me. I doubt they would give up Yessircabbages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Because you don't trade the #1 available free agent for a third string center and a third string point guard and what will be a draft pick in the late 20's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 #1 available free agent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Since Ben Wallace is no longer available he is the #1 free agent. Most media outlets had him ranked at #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Because you don't trade the #1 available free agent for a third string center and a third string point guard and what will be a draft pick in the late 20's. In case you hadn't notice, No one has offered us anything for AL! He's not that good!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 We have no Idea what has been offered for Al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Because you don't trade the #1 available free agent for a third string center and a third string point guard and what will be a draft pick in the late 20's. There are no "rules" on what you get for the #2 FA going into free agency, just like there are no "rules" for how good a player you get at #5 in the draft. Every summer is an isolated market. Right now, letting Al walk is looking appealing to me. I would probably do Jasikevicus, Foster, and a 1st though. My point is, you have to look at the actual options, not what you think the #2 FA deserves. And while it's true that Al is the #1 FA right now, that means very little. If you wait long enough in the summer, Luke Schenscher might be the #1 FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 I understand that but we haven't reached the point yet where we have to weigh down our team with garbage pieces. I'd rather let Al walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted July 5, 2006 Moderators Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 and everyone knows we don't want to keep him. Getting AJ and Foster would give us a full squad for the first time in years. We would have two nba points guards in Speedy/AJ and two SGs in JJ/Salim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 What did Lue and Ivey Die All of a sudden? We don't need to trade Al for superfluous pieces. We don't need 18 pgs. We don't need 12 backup centers. Seriously what would foster bring us that we cant get from Landlord, Este, and Edwards? Are those 9 rebounds he gets per game enough to trade our most valuable piece for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: What did Lue and Ivey Die All of a sudden? We don't need to trade Al for superfluous pieces. We don't need 18 pgs. We don't need 12 backup centers. Seriously what would foster bring us that we cant get from Landlord, Este, and Edwards? Are those 9 rebounds he gets per game enough to trade our most valuable piece for? The 1st round pick next year makes the deal. Why don't you get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnybravo4 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Because the pick will be in the late 20's which means that it will stink. We had about 15 years of drafting in the 20's. I was never impressed. And in any event we don't need anymore young players. I don't even want to draft anyone next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now