swolehawk2 Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Would you trade AL to Houston for Swift/Ryan Bowen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Would you trade AL to Houston for Swift/Ryan Bowen? Swift is just a bad player. I don't know much about Bowens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Would you trade AL to Houston for Swift/Ryan Bowen? No way. Al is not the greatest player but Swift and Bowen are garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seano Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Would you trade AL to Houston for Swift/Ryan Bowen? I don't believe Stromile Swift is even available for Houston to trade anymore. He and his massive contract were reportedly traded on the night of the draft along with Rudy Gay to Memphis for Shane Battier, though that won't become official until the new salary cap figures are determined- which should be happening any day now. Great trade for the Rockets, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Golden State took on some smaller/shorter contracts in return for Derek Fisher to Utah. Does this set up an Atlanta deal with Golden State? I do not know what this does. Its my understanding that you cannot move a player until after 60 days from when the trade agreement was signed. That means 60 days from July 12th at the earliest. Also the Bulls trade puts an end to any talk with the them. PJ has a nice expiring contract but he nor Smith can be traded for at least 60 days after the contract is signed either... I think Al's options for a big pay day are really getting smaller and smaller as the clock keeps ticking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 You can re-trade a player AS LONG AS he's the only player being traded out. IOW, either PJ or JR can be traded immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: You can re-trade a player AS LONG AS he's the only player being traded out. IOW, either PJ or JR can be traded immediately. but from the article about the deal: Quote: Smith, then, figures to be a valuable trade chip for the Bulls if he can't crack coach Scott Skiles' rotation, although league rules would preclude Chicago from dealing him until 90 days after this trade is officially consummated. Too many technicalities in the NBA for me to keep up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: You can re-trade a player AS LONG AS he's the only player being traded out. IOW, either PJ or JR can be traded immediately. ESPN says the Bulls cannot trade JR even though he is a good tradeable asset for 60 days after the contract is signed. Here is the quote and link: Quote: although league restrictions on trades would make it difficult for Chicago to move him until 60 days after this trade is officially consummated http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2510218 It is in the last paragraph in the article. I hope they are wrong. Would give Al and us a whole lot more options... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesheedera Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Looks like they edited their article from 90 days to 60 days. Maybe there's more confusion over there in Bristol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Quote: Too many technicalities in the NBA for me to keep up with. I agree! If I was a lawyer then I would understand all this but I am just a simple computer nerd that loves basketball... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted July 5, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Go here: http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#67 Quote: In addition, teams cannot trade players under the following circumstances: * For two months after receiving the player in trade or claiming him off waivers, if the player is being traded in combination with other players. However, the team is free to trade the player by himself (not packaged with other players) immediately. This restriction applies only to teams over the salary cap. 1. The Bulls can trade either play individually NOW. 2. If I'm reading Coon right, teams under the cap can re-trade whomever they like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 As I said before, GS didn't improve at the point (over Claxton) when they traded for Baron Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Apparently they haven't signed Patrick O'Bryant to a contract yet. The speculation among GS fans is that he would be included along with one of their unsavory contracts in an Al SNT deal. I have a feeling like there will be a 3rd team involved that wants one of those overpaid players and can give up and expirer or draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seano Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Wow, if we could get a great prospect like O'Bryant out of a Harrington trade...I would be really, really pumped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezmund Posted July 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 Well we did work out O'Bryant so that has to count for something. We have to find out what teams would like to have Murphy or Dunleavy. Indiana for Dunleavy? Murphy to Detroit or Chicago? Hmm.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 I think there is merit to your line of reasoning; ie trade for Murphy and win now. You gotta wonder what is BK's plan when there is this thought in the back of his head there may be no tomorrow; ie owner's dispute. All the talk of next year, two years may not mean anything. Not to say he'd make a crazy deal, but it has to make the idea of winning NOW more prevalent. I think he's close to having the plan he's laid out put in place. If it were me, I'd want to try and get it done. If we could get one of their young guys, that would be equivalent of a first rounder, and maybe better. If that were so, we'd be set for a long time with bigs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now