exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: To say Marbury has been a ballhog his entire career is just stupid and you obviously don't watch these guys play. You got it backwards. Marbury and AI do the exact same thing that every gripes about with Lue. They dribble around and around looking to score while everyone stands around. When the D stops them from scoring they pass out to one of the guys standing around watching. The difference is that AI and Marbury do it a lot more and are a lot better at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: That said, I'm not worried about it because I think he'll be a all-star caliber player in the league. He has all the physical tools and skills to be that type of player. I agree. I think Marvin can be that player but until he actually is that player the hawks won't be contenders. There have been many posts about someone stepping up to be the secondary scorer to JJ. Bottom line is that there is only one guy on the roster who fits that bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: The difference is that AI and Marbury do it a lot more and are a lot better at it. That is IDIOTIC - JEEZ just admit it. AI is a hall of famer. You can put him up against "DownTown Freddie Brown" if you want to - but normal people understand that U are being Silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutz Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Lue is NOWHERE near the caliber of players Iverson and Marbury are. So don't even try to compare them. Thats laughable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: Lue is NOWHERE near the caliber of players Iverson and Marbury are. So don't even try to compare them. Thats laughable and there is a HUGE gap between A I and Marbury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: Lue is NOWHERE near the caliber of players Iverson and Marbury are. So don't even try to compare them. Thats laughable Of course they aren't the same. But they do the same things. They dribble around looking to score first, if they can't score then they pass. Obviously AI and Marbury are better. Lue has been a bench player his whole career. Duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: and there is a HUGE gap between A I and Marbury. True. Marbury at least shows a little restraint in his shot selection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 I like TLue - but on another team. Starbury never lived up to his nickname. AI is the man - a warrior. The answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Then why is he shooting 41%? Why is he ranked 87th in the league in True Shooting %? Because he is a chucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 It comes down to what did you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted December 13, 2006 Admin Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 yep, also don't leave out Childress. While I don't see him being a consistant 20ppg guy, he can be a consistant 12-14ppg player and with his intangibles, that's going to make a big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: yep, also don't leave out Childress. While I don't see him being a consistant 20ppg guy, he can be a consistant 12-14ppg player and with his intangibles, that's going to make a big difference. Personally...I think we should keep JC - pitch MW for AI and have a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted December 13, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: Quote: I agree. Iverson is a ballhog who plays zero defense ... Do you even watch NBA basketball? That is the MF-in stupidest quote I have ever seen. AI averages more assists than ANYBODY on our current team. So that makes him a ballhog? see TLue. PS: see steals stats - no AI can't control the phuckin paint. No, I've been going to Hawks games in person since Eddie Johnson was in Atlanta so obviously I've never watched the NBA. Anyone who really watches the NBA knows Iverson is an undersized guard who plays zero defense, has a gigantic ego and only scores points by throwing up a ton of attempts. The fact he manages to scrap out a few assists in his constant manipulation of the ball means nothing to me. Starbury is exactly the same. Do you want him too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Childress is a finisher but he can't create at all. I think he can play well off JJ and Marvin but if he tries to go 1 on 1 with a man up on him he can't do much. but he can definitely finish when opportunities are created for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swatguy Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: Quote: I agree. Iverson is a ballhog who plays zero defense ... Do you even watch NBA basketball? That is the MF-in stupidest quote I have ever seen. AI averages more assists than ANYBODY on our current team. So that makes him a ballhog? see TLue. PS: see steals stats - no AI can't control the phuckin paint. There is no valid reason to say AI plays no defense. It is a smoke screen, something to discredit that is not valid. When you talk about "No Defense" start with Steve Nash. AI plays very good defense and allways had. In the past three years he has averaged 2.3 steals, 7.5 assist and 32 points with teams focused on attempts to contain him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted December 13, 2006 Admin Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 I'd rather take the slow road to respectability than dump what could very well be our 2nd best player for a guy who, when it's all said and done, still wouldn't make us a finals contender. AI wants to go to a contender. He wants to be that missing piece guy. We are nowhere near being that kind of team. Bringing him here wouldn't be much different than leaving him in Philly or sending him to Charlotte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: ...Anyone who really watches the NBA knows Iverson is an undersized guard who plays zero defense, has a gigantic ego and only scores points by throwing up a ton of attempts. The fact he manages to scrap out a few assists in his constant manipulation of the ball means nothing to me. Starbury is exactly the same. Do you want him too? I normally agree with you Sothron...but now I realize that you are totally...............insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted December 13, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 lol steals stats: the last defense of the desperate. Big Dog used to routinely lead or be in the top three for SFs in steals. I guess he was a defensive stopper too using that logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted December 13, 2006 Premium Member Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Iverson, Starbury and Francis are three players that are routinely linked to the Hawks and none of them are worth their money. None of them play a lick of defense. I'm just sick of having to put up with these rumors linking them to our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted December 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Quote: There is no valid reason to say AI plays no defense. Go to any Philly board and ask them about AI's defense. You will find that he doesn't stop penetration from his man, doesn't pressure the ball at all, and is constantly cheating off his man for steals leaving the guys behind him to cover for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now