BusBoyIsBack Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 Quote: For the record, Conley is the best guard in this draft and PTL wants him and the Grizzlies will take him at 4 if we let him go. If Law is so much better why will the Grizzlies not take him? No one is saying Law is better than Conley. No one is saying Crittenton is better than Conley. We're saying there is no way Conley is so much better than Law or Crittenton that it's worth taking him over one of them AND a potential all-star player on top of that. I don't know why that concept is so confusing. If Mike Conley was Derrick Rose, Eric Gordon, or OJ Mayo then shoot yeah I'd just take my PG and just hope that Spencer Hawes can be slightly better than Pachulia. But the disparity at the PG isn't big enough to make that move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 I agree. No one is saying that Conelly isn't a talented pg the question is whether or not he is worth the 3rd pick considering he may not be that much if at all better than Law or Critt. IT's not that Conely is the problem but rather the problem is the desire to maximize the 3rd pick in a way that would improve this ball club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now