Wurider05 Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 because BK/Owners didn't want to give up Marvin Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmooveTheFuture Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 If thats that true they are idiots. Marvin Williams will never even be 50% of the player that Amare is right now. Man you really gotta question who is running this franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Well if they were getting pick 3, 11, zaza and maybe even SHELDEN . I think that is enough. Its not like Amare is a young Shaq or Kareem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimp Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I hope this is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutz Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I agree you can't give up 3,11,Zaza,Shelden and Marvin for only Amare. I mean were getting raped there. Even 3,11, Zaza, and Marvin is a little much. Amare would have been great here but the fact is he is coming off Microfracture surgery on both knees. There is some risk there longterm. I would have given up both picks plus Zaza and either Shelden or Chill plus expirings to get Amare in a heartbeat but anything more is getting crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted June 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 According Vescey we would have had to give up the 2 picks, Lue, and Marvin Williams. I agree with whoever vetoed the trade we are simply giving up too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezmund Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I agree as well. If we are adding Marvin Williams, we are keeping #11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vdunkndunk Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I don't ever remember Peter Vescey being right about anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oiatlhawksfan Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 It's Peter Vecsey, of course, this isn't something you should take seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OdentonFalcon Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I think that was way to much to give up for Amare. Why does everyone want to rape the Hawks for our young players. I find it interesting that we were the youngest team in the NBA. We have the talent, we can stay good for a long time if we play it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted June 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Quote: I think that was way to much to give up for Amare. Why does everyone want to rape the Hawks for our young players. I find it interesting that we were the youngest team in the NBA. We have the talent, we can stay good for a long time if we play it right. That is very true. We do have talent on this team and other teams realize it but too bad some of us so called fans don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Quote: I don't ever remember Peter Vescey being right about anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Walter Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Quote: because BK/Owners didn't want to give up Marvin Williams. I just would have demanded they take Speedy and we get their late 1st (Rudy Fernandez). MW isn't worth all this special treatment frankly. Gotta get a stud when you can. W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seano Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Quote: I don't ever remember Peter Vescey being right about anything. That was my thought exactly. He is always to be taken with a HUGE grain of salt. Vescey is often about as credible as the National Enquirer, so this is *not* something for Hawks fans to get all worked-up about in my opinion. If it's corroborated elsewhere by reputable sources, well then there might be something to it. But to get upset over something that Peter Vescey writes is just kind of silly, and really, really pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now