NJHAWK Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Dont shoot me but we would dump Speedy a year early which could help us keep Marv. I like Bibby if healthy but wouldnt Marbury give us more? So with news coming out that Marbury and the Knicks are doen would you do this deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 5, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Quote: Dont shoot me but we would dump Speedy a year early which could help us keep Marv. I like Bibby if healthy but wouldnt Marbury give us more? So with news coming out that Marbury and the Knicks are doen would you do this deal? Doesn't Marbury cost about $20 mil a year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EazyRoc Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 He's not productive nor is he the type of veteran this team needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted July 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Quote: Quote: Dont shoot me but we would dump Speedy a year early which could help us keep Marv. I like Bibby if healthy but wouldnt Marbury give us more? So with news coming out that Marbury and the Knicks are doen would you do this deal? Doesn't Marbury cost about $20 mil a year? Yes but only for this season and then he comes off the books. Bibby only has 1 year at 15 mill but Speedy has 2 years left at over 5 mill each year. What this trade does is get Speedy off our books a year early and it would help us to keep Marv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted July 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Quote: He's not productive nor is he the type of veteran this team needs. He is productive but he is selfish and I cant argue the part about him not being a veteran this team needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattlanta Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Marbury will be a cancer to this organization! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted July 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Quote: NO LOL, I guess I want to rid us of Speedys deal so bad I have gold fever for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris18 Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeman Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 HELL NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 I said hell no; but if you threw in the Knicks 2009 and 2011 unprotected 1st I would bite the bullet and take Starbury.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swatguy Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Quote: which could help us keep Marv. /quote] "keep Marv", KEEP MARV? Are you kidding? I say no to Marbury. I say Trade Marvin and Bibby for 'Melo. And hope Speedy is ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TruJerz Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 no not unless a 1st round draft pick comes along with him..Marbury has skills but he just aint a point guard..he's forced to play that position because of his height but he's really a SG in a PG's body. Bibby is a better PG than Marbury but isnt more talented than him. I would go with Bibby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 OMG NO !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member AtLaS Posted July 6, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 If we couldn't get anything else significant in a package involving Bibby, than I'd probably do it at the deadline if the Hawks weren't playing very well, that way, we rent him for 1/3 of the season and lose Speedy. Otherwise, I think Bibby could be used in a package with Marvin or someone else and get us a much better return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTB Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 Hellll!!!!! to the naw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted July 6, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/n...x015748088jul01,0,7948383.story ...which would derail any ideas of trading for him, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 6, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 I thought that Marbury's playing days are over... Although I read rumbles out of Phoenix that they might consider bringing him in to BU Nash. However, they're also looking at Lue and AJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shug94 Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 Quote: http://www.newsday.com/sports/basketball/n...x015748088jul01,0,7948383.story ...which would derail any ideas of trading for him, of course. Which means we could just sign him for the veterans minimum! j/k. I reckon he might follow his bball dreams to italy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 6, 2008 Report Share Posted July 6, 2008 As much as I don't like both guys, I say.... Hell no. Losses have followed SM everywhere he has went. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now