Premium Member mrhonline Posted July 27, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 27, 2008 I don't understand why the ASG are making this so complicated. There are obviously teams interested in Smith, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. A S&T is only going to save you a few million anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Peoriabird Posted July 27, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 27, 2008 I don't understand why the ASG are making this so complicated. There are obviously teams interested in Smith, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. A S&T is only going to save you a few million anyway. They will! We just need to be patient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted July 27, 2008 Report Share Posted July 27, 2008 This has always been the best option. Smoove is only 22. The only way he loses value in the next 2 or 3 years is if he has a horrible injury. Otherwise we can trade him when there is no byc restriction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris18 Posted July 27, 2008 Report Share Posted July 27, 2008 I don't understand why the ASG are making this so complicated. There are obviously teams interested in Smith, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. A S&T is only going to save you a few million anyway. The reason this is so complicated is because we're dealing with the ASG not a normal ownership group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emplay Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 if he signs the qualifying offer - he would then attain veto power on any trade. plus the salary coming back would have to match - so it would be difficult to move him for a big name salary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtLaS Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 The reason this is so complicated is because we're dealing with the ASG not a normal ownership group. I'm just going to not say anything and 100% concur with this statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hussamga Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 Yah its not like we lose anything big by overpaying for him...heck everyone overpays. Even a year or 2 down the road, we can still trade him if we overpay..we might get a couple mill in value less back however..but its not like hes gonna be untradeable. Thing is with bibby and zaza expiring, there will be enough room to resign marvin and SNT childress next year ...correct me if im wrong..? Thats why im indifferent to keeping him or trading him personally...i like smoove..but if he wants out and we can get a veteran starter or 2 im all for it..if we keep him at even 13m per, i wouldnt mind either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now