Guest Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 Yep let's chill with the name calling and until the point comes when this video can be posted online let's just drop this subject since nobody is going to convince anyone to change their mind based on something they can't see. Sorry for that, looking back at this thread that was a little over the edge on my part. Being told to "accept it" just doesn't sit well with me, especially with something that isn't cited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 If I did you can bet I'd make sure you could see/hear it because I'd love to see that crow post afterwards. At no point in time did I say that Woodson did not say that. No crow will be ate if any evidence shows up that shows Woodson saying it, you are confusing my position with someone who denies the event. Skepticism isn't denying the event, it is challenging the evidence that has been presented (which is 0 as of right now). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsinner Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 At no point in time did I say that Woodson did not say that. No crow will be ate if any evidence shows up that shows Woodson saying it, you are confusing my position with someone who denies the event. Skepticism isn't denying the event, it is challenging the evidence that has been presented (which is 0 as of right now). Why should I have to provide anything to you? I heard it therefore I KNOW it was said. I just don't understand why it's so hard to believe something so simple. You're a Woody fan I take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now