Moderators AHF Posted January 26, 2009 Moderators Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Obviously, we didn't really have anything to work with during last year's draft but had we been able to get into the second round this would have been a good guy to take a flier on. With the LAC decimated by injuries, he is putting up some pretty impressive numbers for a guy who is only 20 years old and 7 feet tall. 1/19 - 8 points, 10 rebounds, 6 blocks 1/21 - 23 points, 12 rebounds, 4 blocks, 1 steal 1/23 - 3 points, 7 rebounds, 1 block, 1 steal 1/25 8 points, 20 rebounds, 1 block Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crimedog Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 I don't know if he went too far past where he should have, but with the 35th pick he was definitely a "why not?" sort of athletic 7-footer prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Definitely a no-brainer pick in the second round given his size, age and general athletic ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traceman Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Obviously, we didn't really have anything to work with during last year's draft but had we been able to get into the second round this would have been a good guy to take a flier on. With the LAC decimated by injuries, he is putting up some pretty impressive numbers for a guy who is only 20 years old and 7 feet tall. 1/19 - 8 points, 10 rebounds, 6 blocks 1/21 - 23 points, 12 rebounds, 4 blocks, 1 steal 1/23 - 3 points, 7 rebounds, 1 block, 1 steal 1/25 8 points, 20 rebounds, 1 block Those numbers look good. I always thought he had some upside. I certainly can't see how some folks (well actually maybe only BK) had Shelden as a top 5 pick and this guy falls to the 2nd round. I may be wrong but I think one of those games was against Bynum when Bynum had 42/15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted January 26, 2009 Author Moderators Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 Those numbers look good. I always thought he had some upside. I certainly can't see how some folks (well actually maybe only BK) had Shelden as a top 5 pick and this guy falls to the 2nd round. I may be wrong but I think one of those games was against Bynum when Bynum had 42/15. Yep. The 1/21 game was against Bynum. Both guys went off against eachother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 (edited) Would love to see a young guy like that play along side Al. That would be a dream. Not that Woody would play him? Edited January 27, 2009 by DrReality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattlanta Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 http://www.hawksquawk.net/community/index....howtopic=322925 Lol, one of the links on the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 I still stand by my position that we needed a big capable of playing right away and this guy couldn't score outside of 5' to save his life and he was a terrible FT shooter (which I guess would make him fit in quite nicely with this Hawks team since we can't either). He's definitely be a lot better rebounder and shot blocker than I thought he would be though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 http://www.hawksquawk.net/community/index....howtopic=322925 Lol, one of the links on the bottom. I'm assuming that you're referring to my post at the bottom of that thread which I'm guessing you missed the part where I said SENE will never have a 20/10 game and while I haven't looked it up I don't believe he has either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted January 29, 2009 Author Moderators Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 I still stand by my position that we needed a big capable of playing right away and this guy couldn't score outside of 5' to save his life and he was a terrible FT shooter (which I guess would make him fit in quite nicely with this Hawks team since we can't either). He's definitely be a lot better rebounder and shot blocker than I thought he would be though. You rarely get a big man with big upside who is ready to step in and play right away in the second round! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 You rarely get a big man with big upside who is ready to step in and play right away in the second round! I don't disagree with you there at all but my point was that rather than trade for that 2nd rounder when we're right up against the spending limit I'd rather spend those dollars on a veteran big man than a project big. I would gladly take a project big if we had the dollars to spend on him and the time to develop him. Of course as it turned out we used that money to sign Randolph Morris and I think it's safe to assume that Deandre Jordan is already better than Morris so it hasn't worked out too well for us. Morris certainly wasn't the big I had hoped we signed and if I knew at the time he was the best we were going to sign in FA I would have probably tried to get a 2nd rounder to draft a project big instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now