Premium Member Diesel Posted June 25, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 Is it alright if I dream aloud about Marvin/Morris for Pryzbillia/Blake? Bibby/Blake Crawford/Draft pick/West Joe/Mo Smoove/Harrington Horf/Pryz/Zaza You all do know that we're keeping Bibby? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsuteke Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 If that trade goes down it'll show the Hawks made a HUGE mistake in draftin Marvin Williams. I still believe Marvin has value as a member of this team, I understand I'm in the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted June 25, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I don't think this has anything to do with keeping Marvin. Marvin's price will determine whether the Hawks keep him. Crawford is Flip's replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted June 25, 2009 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I don't think this has anything to do with keeping Marvin. Marvin's price will determine whether the Hawks keep him. Crawford is Flip's replacement. I think Crawford can be more than a BU SG. I think he can be the starting SG... roll Joe to SF. I believe wholeheartedly that Bibby is coming back. That leaves Marvin for a trade. Now, we can say Marvin and Smoove for Bosh or Amare... However, I want to believe that we sure up holes by getting a defensive big (Pryz) and a pretty good PG (who could challenge Bibby) in Blake. Then we can draft either a SG (Ellington) or a PG (Lawson) or an OG (Teague). It's all interesting tonight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted June 25, 2009 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I wonder if it's possible to get Felton for Marvin? Felton/Crawford/Joe/Smoove/Horf. That might be better? With Terrance Williams being Charlotte's pick.... I don't know if this has a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDawg#8 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 marvin is very underated. its hard to find players with his talent that are willing to fit in a role rather than whine and demand getting the ball more. when he gets the oppurtunity, he usually shows up. he has proven that he can score 25 a game when asked to do so. i think we will really regret letting him go one day. if woodson could ever figure out how to use all his weapons, we could be unstoppable.... seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmooveTheFuture Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I wonder if it's possible to get Felton for Marvin? Felton/Crawford/Joe/Smoove/Horf. That might be better? With Terrance Williams being Charlotte's pick.... I don't know if this has a chance. if we got felton for marvin that would be amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted June 25, 2009 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 marvin is very underated. its hard to find players with his talent that are willing to fit in a role rather than whine and demand getting the ball more. when he gets the oppurtunity, he usually shows up. he has proven that he can score 25 a game when asked to do so. i think we will really regret letting him go one day. if woodson could ever figure out how to use all his weapons, we could be unstoppable.... seriously. No, I think Marvin is rated just about right. Without aggression, none of the other stuff matters as much. However, our decision on Marvin will be financial vs. Need. IF Woody can be sold on Crawford as starting SG (he is making 8 million dollars). Then Joe goes to Sf and Marvin has to be traded. I think Joe would do better at Sf simply because he's not chasing SGs around and wearing himself down. IF Joe can remain a 20+ scorer and Crawford can give us 16-18... There's no need for Marvin. Marvin for Felton may work out good for both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlsportfanz Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 If we started Bibby and Crawford, you're looking at possibly the worst defensive backcourt in the history of the NBA. Neither one of them plays defense at all. Crawford hopefully will be Flip version 2.0. A great scorer off the bench and someone who can provide a spark when the first unit is dragging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk88 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 I think Crawford can be more than a BU SG. I think he can be the starting SG... roll Joe to SF. I believe wholeheartedly that Bibby is coming back. That leaves Marvin for a trade. Now, we can say Marvin and Smoove for Bosh or Amare... However, I want to believe that we sure up holes by getting a defensive big (Pryz) and a pretty good PG (who could challenge Bibby) in Blake. Then we can draft either a SG (Ellington) or a PG (Lawson) or an OG (Teague). It's all interesting tonight! Marvin and Smoove for Bosh. Me Likey! Hawk88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDawg#8 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 yeah... i doubt that crawford will start at the 2 for us, unless somebody goes down with an injury. i think his best chances are starting 1 or backup 2. and seriously, marvins versatility and BBIQ will be missed if he is gone. i dont understand the love for a player who is immature inconsistent but Agressive in Smith over a player that is Smart, plays his role but not as agressive in Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 Trading Speedy makes it much less likely that Marvin gets traded. Speedy's contract was the BYC buster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 If we started Bibby and Crawford, you're looking at possibly the worst defensive backcourt in the history of the NBA. Neither one of them plays defense at all. Crawford hopefully will be Flip version 2.0. A great scorer off the bench and someone who can provide a spark when the first unit is dragging. That is a big factor in him coming off the bench. Then we have first and second string guards that don't guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted June 25, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 Trading Speedy makes it much less likely that Marvin gets traded. Speedy's contract was the BYC buster. Hadn't thought of that yet. The Hawks currently have just 6 players under contract: PG: None SG: JJ SF: Evans PF: Smith CR: Horford 6th: Crawford Sucks: Morris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDawg#8 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 PG: None SG: JJ SF: Evans PF: Smith CR: Horford 6th: Crawford Sucks: Morris can we stop considering Evans as a sf. dude is smaller than alot of sg's, im tired of watching him get punked whenever he guards the 3 position. him on lebron was too painful to watch, esp when we all know joe could have d-up on him alot better. Evans needs to be the backup 2, crawford at the 1 (atl's version of a pg anyway). and we need to find a REAL backup SF who stands between 6-7 and 6-9. for two purposes. one, to provide defense against the large 3's in our league, and 2, to actually matchup with williams in practice so that he can can get a legit size comparison of what he will face on gameday. him against Evans in practice is a true disservice to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted June 25, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 can we stop considering Evans as a sf. You'll have to talk to Woodson about that. (Evans doesn't have the handles to play SG). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedDawg#8 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 i know, it just erks the hell out of me seeing him at the 3. and trufully, he shouldnt have to handle the ball (like joe does) as a real 2, if he had a pg to set him up with his shots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameTime Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 You'll have to talk to Woodson about that. (Evans doesn't have the handles to play SG). Evans doesn't have the handles to play PF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 if we got felton for marvin that would be amazing. yeah...for CHARLOTTE! Marvin and Smoove for Bosh. not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimsey Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 Minny more than ever has a huge hole at SF. Pick 6 and Songalia for MW. I know for a fact they will pick Evans with one of their top 6 picks.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now