NJHAWK Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/602...o_trade_boozer/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Don't think he is what we need . . . . a real BIG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted July 1, 2009 Moderators Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Pass. We can't add that salary with Horford and Smith on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 Pass. We can't add that salary with Horford and Smith on the team. Hm.. I'd actually prefer Boozer to Smith, I think. Boozer is one of the few reliable low post scorers. Then again, maybe I am confusing the Hawks with my WhatIfSports team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WraithSentinel Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 I won't no part of Boozer. We only trade for him if we are looking for long term cap relief from Smoove contract. Boozer can be our new Speedy Claxton. We know he is going to get injured and will not earn his money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted July 1, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 (edited) Detroit or Memphis makes sense. Edited July 1, 2009 by mrhonline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 He;s a Detroit type of player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawksrule9 Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Don't need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchman Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Don't need him. It would be nice to have someone besides Horford and Zaza who can rebound. Throw in his scoring ability, and it sounds like an upgrade to me. The only drawback would be his propensity for injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Don't call us. We can't afford him and keep our other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeye242424 Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Don't call us. We can't afford him and keep our other players. What he said ^^^^. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 8, 2009 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 Hm.. I'd actually prefer Boozer to Smith, I think. Boozer is one of the few reliable low post scorers. Then again, maybe I am confusing the Hawks with my WhatIfSports team... Pass. Boozer is always hurt. Makes too much money to be unreliable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now