Hollinger article in ESPN insider - Reason for Hawks slump

[jerrywest]

Perhaps I should have retained my skepticism a few weeks longer. When the Hawks got off to such a blistering start this season, I tried to curb my enthusiasm. They weren't supposed to be this good and would probably regress to the mean, I thought, especially since they lacked a superstar performer and had yet to have a major injury.

That thought process changed on Dec. 18, when I saw Atlanta dismantle Utah so thoroughly that the Jazz pulled their starters midway through the third quarter ... with the Hawks leading by 27, after scoring 17 fast-break points in the first six minutes of the third quarter. While Atlanta had played well on other nights, that game was the first time this season when I really thought, "Wow, these guys are good." Cosmetic scoring made the final (96-83) much more respectable, but anyone leaving Philips Arena that night had the distinct impression the Hawks had arrived as an elite team.

Since then, however, they've done everything in their power to reverse my opinion.

After the Utah game, the Hawks' record was 19-6, with a strong point differential against a good schedule. At the time, they stood atop my Power Rankings, largely due to an unexpectedly potent offense that topped the league in offensive efficiency.

Atlanta has played eight games since then, and won only two of them -- against Minnesota and Indiana. The last four games, all defeats, have proven particularly painful -- Atlanta had consecutive second-half meltdowns against Cleveland, the latter coming with the aid of a clock malfunction, dropped a home game against a lesser New York team when Nate Robinson came out of cold storage to hang 41 on them, and suffered a one-sided rout by a Jermaine O'Neal-less Heat team in Miami on Monday night.

While the losing streak is unlikely to hit five -- the Hawks' next contest is at home against New Jersey on Wednesday -- Atlanta is in danger of losing contact with the other Eastern powers in the playoff race. The defeats dropped the Hawks to 21-12, and with a Boston-Orlando-Boston stretch coming up over the weekend, they could easily be five games out of the third spot in the East by this time next week.

Although it's possible one of the Cleveland losses could still end up in the win column -- if the Hawks' protest of the second Cleveland loss is upheld and the replay (likely April 2 in Cleveland) goes in their favor -- the takeaway from the past eight games remains the same.

The common thread? Atlanta's once-vaunted offense has hit a wall. Although the Hawks still rank second in the league in offensive efficiency (109.3), they haven't been playing up to their usual level in the past eight games, with an efficiency mark of 105.8 -- and only 101.9 if you subtract the two doormats (Minnesota and Indiana).

Subjectively, they've been worse than those numbers, because they've saved their worst for the times that matter most. A six-point overtime against Chicago. A nearly nine-minute drought in the fourth-quarter against Cleveland, followed by a 37-point second half the next night. A 19-point fourth quarter against a toothless Knicks defense. Monday night's 75-point debacle in Miami was a rarity because it lasted all four quarters, but six of the past eight games have shown extended stretches when Atlanta's offense went off the rails.

Look a little deeper, and there's a surprising reason. The Hawks' offense has benefited from an odd approach, as I mentioned a few weeks ago -- they don't shoot a particularly highly percentage, but they're so good at rebounding and avoiding turnovers that they generate far more shot attempts per possession than most teams.

Lately, however, one of those planks has disintegrated: The Hawks stopped getting offensive rebounds. Atlanta's offensive rebound rate in the past eight games is a measly 17.7 percent, barely half what they were averaging until that point. In two games against the Cavs, the Hawks grabbed only 12 offensive boards while Cleveland nabbed 87 defensive boards -- with no second shots, perhaps the second-half offensive meltdowns were inevitable.

Even against lesser teams, it's happened: Atlanta survived against lowly Indiana, for instance, while grabbing a measly three offensive boards. On other nights, against better teams -- such as Monday, when they grabbed only seven of their 46 misses against Miami -- they couldn't slip by so easily.

Atlanta once stood third in the league in offensive rebound rate at 30.4 percent; thanks to the Hawks' recent malaise, they're a distant seventh at 28.1 percent. It's unclear to me why the second shots vanished, and given the small sample of games there might not be any reason at all.

Nonetheless, it's something they'll have to remedy if they're going to keep pace with the three top dogs in the East -- a group they've already fallen dangerously behind.

With plenty of time left and a chance to quickly make up a few games this weekend, the Hawks can get back in the race for a top-two seed. But the lesson here is that the Hawks won't rebound in the standings unless they rebound a few more of their own misses./

its been evident that there is no longer a commitment to rebounding. This happened early last year as well. It seems that this will be a problem as long as this team is together.

[benhillboy]

Hey Hollinger, I can sum it up much better: Our starting 3 is a bum's bum and our "star" 2 plays with no heart, athleticism, or intensity. You're welcome. Anytime.

Edited January 6, 2010 by benhillboy

[Wurider05]

Its hard to get offensive rebounds when everyone is shooting jumpers all the damn time. Iso JJ and Iso Craw removes everyone from the basket and makes them spectators. NO ONE IS UNDER THE BASKET TO GET THE REBOUND. OUR LACK OF OFFENSE IS WHAT IS KILLING UP. WE CAN'T AFFORD TO TURN INTO THE JJ SHOW. WE MUST EVOLVE INTO SOMETHING MORE!!!

[TheNorthCydeRises]

Its hard to get offensive rebounds when everyone is shooting jumpers all the damn time. Iso JJ and Iso Craw removes everyone from the basket and makes them spectators. NO ONE IS UNDER THE BASKET TO GET THE REBOUND. OUR LACK OF OFFENSE IS WHAT IS KILLING UP. WE CAN'T AFFORD TO TURN INTO THE JJ SHOW. WE MUST EVOLVE INTO SOMETHING MORE!!!

That's usually when teams get offensive rebounds . . . off of jumpshots. All they have to do, is do what Woody tells them to do, and they'll be OK. REBOUND AND DEFEND. But when you let Nate Robinson and Michael Beasley go off on you, you're probably going to lose.

When this team play defense and goes after rebounds, they're hard to beat. When they make their open jumpshots, they're hard to bat. We haven't done either lately.

The actual key for the Hawks, is for our backcourt to play better than the opponent's backcourt. When that happens, the Hawks always win.

[coachx]

That's usually when teams get offensive rebounds . . . off of jumpshots.

I realize that is a common saying but its NOT true ? Actually, on most jump shots the defenders are set in position, in the paint, to box out for a rebound. Sometimes, when the shooter miss by alot, there is a " long rebound"

where the offense may have the advantage but when you don't get that long offensive rebound its the easiest fast break in basketbal to score on.

I was alwayse taught the opposite approach. The best chance at an offensive rebound is when the offense attacks the paint. This causes the defenders to leave their man (who they could be boxing out) to pick up the penetrator, for help defense, which opens up offensive rebound oppurtunities for their original assignment. Even on a post up, where a double team is forced, the back side is often not boxed out for an easy offensive put back.

Then again.............after seeing Paul Hewitt's team, full of future NBA players, get smashed by a undertalented Bulldog team I'm not sure what is being "taught" by some of these coaches but I hear stories from real HS coaches that plenty of coaches lack...............well coaching skills, for lack of a better word.

Edited January 6, 2010 by coachx