Crawford replacing Joe is easy

[NineOhTheRino]

who you bring in to replace Crawford is the real problem.

[Popeye]

who you bring in to replace Crawford is the real problem.

Crawford replacing Joe is easy on the offensive end.....

[NineOhTheRino]

Crawford replacing Joe is easy on the offensive end.....

right again...It's not as simple as some make it out to be. Joe goes and you now have a void defensively and with your bench production.

Edited March 18, 2010 by NineOhTheRino

[Plainview1981]

who you bring in to replace Crawford is the real problem.

Anybody that thinks this team will win with Crawford as the first option is a fooling themselves. Jamal can't defend and he shoots 41% against teams with winning records.

[Diesel]

Anybody that thinks this team will win with Crawford as the first option is a fooling themselves. Jamal can't defend and he shoots 41% against teams with winning records.

If JJ leaves, Sund will have to do some good moves to make up for it. I know Jamal has had 2 great games without Joe but it is Toronto and NJ.

[Plainview1981]

If JJ leaves, Sund will have to do some good moves to make up for it. I know Jamal has had 2 great games without Joe but it is Toronto and NJ.

I didn't see Jamal doing much in the 4th. He did have a great 3 periods, but tonight he had to produce as a first option in the 4th and showed he was in over his head. The role is too big for him.