Joker Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 We are going to lose Jamal so why not? http://www.slamonline.com/online/media/slam-tv/2011/11/video-allen-iverson-crosses-up-jeff-teague/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IheartVolt Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 For the love of god please no... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member hawkman Posted November 27, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 If his body and his MIND is right, why not? The Hawks need bodies right now and he's already been working out with Hawks players in Atlanta during the lockout. If I was the GM, I'd at least talk to some of the guys who worked out with what they honestly think about AI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators lethalweapon3 Posted November 27, 2011 Moderators Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Love AI, as always, but there's no doubt, in his mind, he's nobody's "sixth man." Not even "second man." Having Teague looking over his shoulder to find AI's fans screaming for the hook won't work well for chemistry on this team. And we have a dribble-out-the-shot-clock guy already. I do hope he finds a spot (still moderately-conditioned given his age and injury history), just not on this roster. He's burned enough bridges on two continents now that it literally has to be the perfect low-risk set-up. ~lw3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 (edited) 6th man? NO. As the 3rd PG . . definitely. I have no problem putting AI out on the court at the beginning of the 2nd quarter to spell Teague and play him in the backcourt with Hinrich. Give him 5 - 7 minutes and see if he can make something happen. If he plays well, give him minutes again in the 4th. If not, just keep him on the bench. One thing about it though, Allen Iverson in a Hawks uniform is a box office draw . . even in a limited role. We could do far worse than give him the league minimum, and play him in an Eddie House like role. There will be a few games in which AI has it going, and that's when you extend his minutes. As long as he KNOWS that he has no chance in displacing Teague ( unless Teague dramatically regresses ), then I'm cool with Iverson on the Hawks. And you're right. This team may miss Jamal's scoring punch at times, especially if Teague isn't the same guy that we saw in the Chicago series. Hopefully, a guy like Iverson would finally accept his role as a veteran mentor, and teach Teague how to become an effective scorer. Possible rotation minutes PG - Teague ( 28 ) - Hinrich ( 10 ) - Iverson ( 10 ) G - Johnson ( 22 ) - Hinrich ( 16 ) - Damien ( 10 ) F - Marvin ( 30 ) - Johnson ( 14 ) - Smith ( 4 ) PF - Smith ( 32 ) - Horford ( 16 ) C - Horford ( 20 ) - Zaza ( 20 ) - free agent C ( 8 ) Johnson ( 36 ) Smith ( 36 ) Horford ( 36 ) Marvin ( 30 ) Teague ( 28 ) Hinrich ( 26 ) Zaza ( 20 ) Damien ( 10 ) Iverson ( 10 ) free agent C ( 8 ) Now if Hinrich goes down . . . then we'd have no choice. Teague's minutes would have to increase, as well as Iverson's Edited November 27, 2011 by northcyde 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHawks89 Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Haha, I saw that game live in Atlanta. AI didn't look to shabby. He went off in the 4th quarter and took over the game. In my opinion, he's good enough to play on our roster. It seems like he's out there to prove everyone wrong. But then again, like someone said, I don't know how this would workout with the chemistry of this team. He would bring fans to the game, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member hawkman Posted November 27, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Haha, I saw that game live in Atlanta. AI didn't look to shabby. He went off in the 4th quarter and took over the game. In my opinion, he's good enough to play on our roster. It seems like he's out there to prove everyone wrong. But then again, like someone said, I don't know how this would workout with the chemistry of this team. He would bring fans to the game, that's for sure. That's why it is important to talk this over with the players who played with him first. It's easy to say it won't work from a distance based on AI's past, but I'd put more stock in the opinions with the guys that would have to be on the court with him. If Jamal walks, he'd essentially be his replacement which was basically a gunner off the bench. I think he can fill that role just fine IF his body and mind is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted November 27, 2011 Admin Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Stay away from AI. He is a locker room problem and has been a major distraction to every team he has gone to. He has run out of chances and shouldn't be in the league anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted December 7, 2011 Moderators Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 I am of the same mind as capstone. This guy has been a cancer repeatedly since he left Denver and left his role at or near the center of the team's offense. I don't trust that he will suddenly turn that attitude into a team-first, bench role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 Sometimes I say "might not be too bad" then other times I'm like "hell no" If it's a one year, vet min deal and his mind (more so than his body) is in the right place to be the scorer off the bench then maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swatguy Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 With AI, we may need a different kind of coach. (enter Larry Brown). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted December 7, 2011 Moderators Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 With AI, we may need a different kind of coach. (enter Larry Brown). Larry Brown would only put up with AI when he was the MVP AI. He wouldn't take that from his 8-10th best player on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUhawksfan Posted December 8, 2011 Report Share Posted December 8, 2011 I'm sick of these Iverson threads. They seem to come up once every couple of months. Bringing him in is a ridiculous idea. Stop the insanity!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now