bruincoach Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 They try to center stuff around humphries. How does that make sense for hawks. 12 million next year? Have to be a 3rd team involved I would imagineBrooks/Evans(Ivan Johnson's clone)/Blache/telotovic/1st round pick is the only reasonable pieces of interest with the first round pick AND brooks being highest priorityHowever the 3rd team needed would probably want a first for being involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Jody23 Posted February 11, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I think it's smokescreen or just talk. No way the Hawks do that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandonJ0 Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 jus give me brooks ,wallace and a 1st round pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atlfan25 Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I'm interested to see what teams are being discussed are being discussed for the third team.. and hopefully this progresses quickly just so theres something to talk about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungsta Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 brooklyn just isnt a good trade partner for us and makes zero sense for us. Since its chris broussard I wouldnt take it seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolvetigers Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 jus give me brooks ,wallace and a 1st round pick They dont have a 1st round pick this year, and we have theirs next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTB Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 not a good deal...i know ferry is smarter than that as he knows there are better deals from the mavs and suns who have reportedly are going just as hard for smith..... but this deal with the nets make no sense what so ever. there isnt a good deal out of this any where not even for wallace...10 m a year for wallace is too much....however because smith holds value I am only trading smith for this deal..... blatche/humphries/brooks/pick for smith and morrow see what it is, is that I know ferry can demand alot out of dumb ass billy king...im just saying rip him off! add wallace to that list and done deal. so because i think billy king is dumb and he is. blatche/humphries/brooks/wallace/pick for smith and morrow and to be honest I still wouldnt pull the trigger getting all of that! LOL...of course some of our other players would have to be let go to pull that deal off but you guys get me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Insulting trade proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GameTime Posted February 11, 2013 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 They dont have a 1st round pick this year, and we have theirs next season 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFuzz Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) They dont have a 1st round pick this year, and we have theirs next season They do have their pick this year and we have the right to SWAP picks with them next year AND the year after. I believe we also have their second in 2017 or something. And a deal centered around Humphries is pretty sorry. It would have to start with Brooks/Teletovic/Pick, and I'm not a huge fan of that. Edited February 11, 2013 by TheFuzz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Nice try Broussard...what a joker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruincoach Posted February 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 Bobcats maybe? They get Gordon AND smithWe get Henderson brooks teltovic and 2 first roundersBobcats get Wallace and humphries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruincoach Posted February 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I just think the team needs something to excite them AND the fan baseI believe horford And Teague would be fit immensely and get a couple of picksGives us 3-5 youn players next yearHopefully Teague/horford/korver/Ivan/ free agent/free agent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I have no interest in anything the nets have to offer us PERIOD. Same with Bobcats excluding MKG or their unprotected 1st pick this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 jus give me brooks ,wallace and a 1st round pick It's funny . . . that's all I was asking for Joe Johnson at the time he was traded. Brooks is their version of Jeff Teague in his first 2 years in Atlanta. The guy has great offensive talent, but can't play a lick of defense. Because of that, neither Avery nor PJ will play the kid. With Deron not right, and Gerald Wallace not being used to the best of his ability as a transition scorer, the Nets desperately need to obtain a guy who can be a 6th man type of scorer. LOL . . Brooks could be that, but they won't unleash him for some reason. People are scared of Wallace's 10 million for the next 3 years, but contracts like that can always be traded in that final year, or the year before. Wallace is still a very good on the ball defender and he would be useful on a team that played a lot faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruincoach Posted February 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I would drop over IF we took on Wallace and 30 million of non flexibility 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 I would drop over IF we took on Wallace and 30 million of non flexibility Non flexibility? What about signing Josh to a Max contract? 30 mill for 3 years > 5 years for 94 million And when you want to get out from under a contract, the 3 - 30 is a lot easier to get out from under, than the 5 - 94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfHawk Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 While the Nets certainly want Gordon, sources said acquiring Smith is their higher priority. A trade for Smith would seemingly kill a deal for Gordon, because Humphries is one of the players being discussed with Atlanta. The Nets are willing to give up Humphries and second-year shooting guard MarShon Brooks for Smith. But it almost certainly will take more than a Humphries-Brooks combination to pry Smith away from Atlanta, and one source said the Hawks want Brooklyn's first-round pick. Some scenarios that have been discussed include the Hawks' Anthony Morrow, who played the past two seasons with the Nets, returning to the club. ESPN.com The Brooklyn Nets are aggressively pursuing a trade for Atlanta Hawks star forward Josh Smith, league sources told ESPN. The two teams are engaged in discussions. But one source said while "there has been lots of talk, nothing is close yet." As the NBA's Feb. 21 trade deadline nears, Brooklyn is proving to be one of the most active teams in the league. As reported by ESPN.com on Friday, sources said the Nets also are talking with the Charlotte Bobcats about a Kris Humphries-for-Ben Gordon trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PSSSHHHRRR87 Posted February 11, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) If we trade Smith for Humphries, I will donate all of my Hawks gear and become a full time Pistons fan. SMH at this 5% possibility. Lopez would be a different story, but I want nothing to do with f'ing Humphries. I'm thinking this is just dumbass Broussard trying to get shit started. First he reports that Dwight has no interest in Atlanta and Dwight Sr. comes out and says otherwise and now this... I hate ESPN.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Edited February 11, 2013 by PSSSHHHRRR87 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benhillboy Posted February 11, 2013 Report Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Hopefully I smell a three team trade. Brooks could fill Lou's role, only making a million. The Nets are morons for not giving him experience. He's a sixth man candidate in he making. JJ Hickson can fill Josh's role because he shoots and rebounds a lot better, only making 5 mil, from the A. I don't know how it would/ could happen, but I damn sure would love it. Jefferson too pricey and finnesseful for my tastes, Cousins is just as boneheaded as Josh, if not more. Edited February 11, 2013 by benhillboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now