JTB Posted July 9, 2013 Report Share Posted July 9, 2013 Pg- CP3Sg-LouSf-Smith or Iggy or KorverPf-HorfordC-D12Or something similar to that...but if we can get this rosterPg-Jennings or Ellis or TeagueSg-LouSf-KorverPf-HorfordC-BynumBench Milsap,Jenkins,CarrollThat lineup is a possibility and a BEAST! Not to mention we would have 3 players that are X factors in Jennings or Ellis for pg, horford for pf, and Bynum for Center.Yeah I will quickly forget we missed out on CP3 and D12 if we can get a lineup like this! And for me Bynum just needs to be healthy for the playoffs, this team can win without Bynum over the season! I just think you treat Bynum like Phil did if you want him on your team because he's not going to give you 82 games but that's fine as long as he's ready to go for the playoffs.As for Jennings and or Ellis...we have to keep their egos down and let them know up front that horford is the star of the squad. Also these two need to know that they can depend on others to score...that's Jennings and Ellis main problem! They tend to get into Kobe mode but unlike Kobe they can't score as well or as effienct.All in all we can beat many good teams with thus lineup as long as we are heathy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted July 9, 2013 Report Share Posted July 9, 2013 I love it. I'll let hawksfanatic tell us if it's possible to get Bynum + a premiere PG though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWF Posted July 9, 2013 Report Share Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) We couldn't sign Ellis and Bynum. Sign and trade would have to be done, and I would rather have Jennings in a S&T. Better 3 point shooter, younger and better in the PnR. Other than that, sign me up. JenningsKorverMillsapHorfordBynum Lou 6th man Edited July 9, 2013 by RWF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 9, 2013 Report Share Posted July 9, 2013 (edited) Can we do a SNT for Josh and pick up a trade exception like Utah (or Denver?) did with the Iguadala/Foye SNT that is going to now go down? Then would we have more options? We just include some second round draft choices in the SNT with Josh to get the exception? Edited July 9, 2013 by LongTimeFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GABALLA Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 We couldn't sign Ellis and Bynum. Sign and trade would have to be done, and I would rather have Jennings in a S&T. Better 3 point shooter, younger and better in the PnR. Other than that, sign me up. JenningsKorverMillsapHorfordBynum Lou 6th manEver time someone puts Millsap at sf I figure they must be joking. Next joke, Serg ibaka sf 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Pg- CP3Sg-LouSf-Smith or Iggy or KorverPf-HorfordC-D12Or something similar to that...but if we can get this rosterPg-Jennings or Ellis or TeagueSg-LouSf-KorverPf-HorfordC-BynumBench Milsap,Jenkins,CarrollThat lineup is a possibility and a BEAST! Not to mention we would have 3 players that are X factors in Jennings or Ellis for pg, horford for pf, and Bynum for Center.Yeah I will quickly forget we missed out on CP3 and D12 if we can get a lineup like this! And for me Bynum just needs to be healthy for the playoffs, this team can win without Bynum over the season! I just think you treat Bynum like Phil did if you want him on your team because he's not going to give you 82 games but that's fine as long as he's ready to go for the playoffs.As for Jennings and or Ellis...we have to keep their egos down and let them know up front that horford is the star of the squad. Also these two need to know that they can depend on others to score...that's Jennings and Ellis main problem! They tend to get into Kobe mode but unlike Kobe they can't score as well or as effienct.All in all we can beat many good teams with thus lineup as long as we are heathy. A Jennings/L. Williams/Korver lineup would be a disaster against any athletic wing with size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Ever time someone puts Millsap at sf I figure they must be joking. Next joke, Serg ibaka sfIts amazing that Millsap would agree to 9.5 mil AND agree to come off of the bench, in the prime of his career. Danny must be a smooth talker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) One thing folks need to realize is...yes...Milsap is a big guy...6-8/250...but he didn't get to be the player he is strictly because of that size. He is actually pretty quick, and he has great B-Ball instincts. You don't lead the NCAA in rebounding for 3 years in a row (even at a mid-major) just because you are 6-8. There are plenty of 7-0 guys in the mid-majors...we just drafted one Edited July 10, 2013 by DJlaysitup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PSSSHHHRRR87 Posted July 10, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 C - BynumPF - HorfordSF - KorverSG - MontaPG - Teague is the lineup I want. IDK why peeps keep putting Monta at point... He isn't a PG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) A Jennings/L. Williams/Korver lineup would be a disaster against any athletic wing with size.Not so long as you have a shot changer in the post. Gasol is the reason Memphis can play damn near anyone at SF and still be a solid team. Edited July 10, 2013 by Buzzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 C - BynumPF - HorfordSF - KorverSG - MontaPG - Teague is the lineup I want. IDK why peeps keep putting Monta at point... He isn't a PG.Can we afford Monta, Teague and Bynum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GABALLA Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) Its amazing that Millsap would agree to 9.5 mil AND agree to come off of the bench, in the prime of his career. Danny must be a smooth talker. One thing folks need to realize is...yes...Milsap is a big guy...6-8/250...but he didn't get to be the player he is strictly because of that size. He is actually pretty quick, and he has great B-Ball instincts. You don't lead the NCAA in rebounding for 3 years in a row (even at a mid-major) just because you are 6-8. There are plenty of 7-0 guys in the mid-majors...we just drafted one Its amazing that Millsap would agree to 9.5 mil AND agree to come off of the bench, in the prime of his career. Danny must be a smooth talker.More like smooth criminal. If we don't get Bynum Al will play center and millsap will be pf. Muscala won't start and Millsap won't be sf. Zach Randolph has decent ball skills too.....see where I'm going with this Edited July 10, 2013 by GABALLA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Not so long as you have a shot changer in the post. Gasol is the reason Memphis can play damn near anyone at SF and still be a solid team. This ^ Add to that you would have AL (a good shot blocker) at PF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 If we hadJenningsJenkinsKorverHorfBynum Milsap, Lou and Carroll off the bench. I would love that.Can we afford Monta, Teague and Bynum?Unless Monta take less than 9 mil and Jeff signs the QO then no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 OK, Ok, ok....here is my thinking if we get Bynum. In the past we had dumb ole Woody who just preached defense and that was it. Then we had LD who seemed to be a little smarter - but hardly ever changed the starting lineup unless somebody was in the doghouse. NOW (hopefully) we have a smarter coach who can react to matchups. We would also have a pretty veteran team who could understand his logic. So he says to Milsap (who is well paid) - some nights you start - some nights you come off the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted July 10, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Can we afford Monta, Teague and Bynum?Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Not even close.I didn't think so, thought maybe he new something that I didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 OK, Ok, ok....here is my thinking if we get Bynum. In the past we had dumb ole Woody who just preached defense and that was it. Then we had LD who seemed to be a little smarter - but hardly ever changed the starting lineup unless somebody was in the doghouse. NOW (hopefully) we have a smarter coach who can react to matchups. We would also have a pretty veteran team who could understand his logic. So he says to Milsap (who is well paid) - some nights you start - some nights you come off the bench.I think if we get a center worth starting that Millsap will start at SF. Just hard to imagine that dude agreeing to take less money AND come off the bench, while stating how ATL is a great opportunity to "grow his game." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 JenningsJenkinsKorverHorfDaly With Lou, Carroll, and Milsap would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) If we get Bynum can we still match and re-sign Teague? I could certainly be happy with: TeagueKorverMilsapALBynum Edited July 10, 2013 by DJlaysitup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now