Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 (edited) If he is waived, would it really be that bad of an idea? Yes I know, we have a plethora of forwards. But maybe, just maybe, a new start is all dude needs to step up his game, to where it once was. Just a thought... Edited February 25, 2014 by Camouflage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member cam1218 Posted February 25, 2014 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 If we were healthy I'd be for it. At this point I don't think it's really worth it.Plus, I don't think he is even considering us anyways. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimeyKidd Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Hes looking at the top 2 in each conference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameTime Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 If we were healthy I'd be for it. At this point I don't think it's really worth it.Plus, I don't think he is even considering us anyways. Who can pay him more and guarantee him minutes? Granger is not old enough to be the minimum ring chase guy; He still is fighting for a contract. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member cam1218 Posted February 25, 2014 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Who can pay him more and guarantee him minutes? Granger is not old enough to be the minimum ring chase guy; He still is fighting for a contract.The report I read said he would decide between the Heat, Bulls, Clippers, Mavs and Spurs.I do think it would be wise for him to get minutes to show other teams he is still productive. It's up to him if he wants to play a lot or come off the bench and play in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien717 Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 If we were healthy I'd be for it. At this point I don't think it's really worth it.I agree with this completely, in that scenario he could have been a piece to help us make some noise in the playoffs. But at this point all he would do is kill our lottery chances.Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 I agree with this completely, in that scenario he could have been a piece to help us make some noise in the playoffs. But at this point all he would do is kill our lottery chances.Sent from my SPH-L710 using TapatalkSeriously? Your last statement sucks and makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Really. No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien717 Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Seriously? Your last statement sucks and makes no sense.It makes no sense, what is so hard to the understand about it?Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameTime Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 I agree with this completely, in that scenario he could have been a piece to help us make some noise in the playoffs. But at this point all he would do is kill our lottery chances.Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk Lottery chances? They ended when we signed Budenholzer. Danny Granger would be smart to sign with someone who could potential re-sign him next year. We can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 It makes no sense, what is so hard to the understand about it?Sent from my SPH-L710 using TapatalkBecause the whole point in signing talent is to avoid "lottery chances" unless your implying wanting to tank the season. Which makes no sense and is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien717 Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Because the whole point in signing talent is to avoid "lottery chances" unless your implying wanting to tank the season. Which makes no sense and is stupid.That view is too simplistic. Like I said originally if we were at full force and he was an additional piece that could make us a legitimate threat than yes. The Hawks are the poster team for proving that a middling playoff team is no man's land in the NBA. Do you honestly think barely making the playoffs this year and getting booted early is better for this franchise than getting in the lottery? That is a legit question for you by the way. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungsta Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 (edited) getting him wont effect our record anyway. Hes no longer a difference maker. Hes done and his knees are cooked. if you have watched this year you would of seen how awful he has been. The pacers couldnt wait to get rid of him Edited February 25, 2014 by yungsta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 (edited) @ATLien717Do you honestly think barely making the playoffs this year and getting booted early is better for this franchise than getting in the lottery? That is a legit question for you by the way. -----------Yes I do. And I say that for many reasons. Main reasons being this: butts in the seats create revenue. National tv exposure creates fans. Attractive possibility for free agency. I can go on and on with pros and cons. But pros outweighs the cons million:one Edited February 25, 2014 by Camouflage 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien717 Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 ATLienDo you honestly think barely making the playoffs this year and getting booted early is better for this franchise than getting in the lottery? That is a legit question for you by the way. -----------Yes I do. And I say that for many reasons. Main reasons being this: butts in the seats create revenue. National tv exposure creates fans. Attractive possibility for free agency. I can go on and on with pros and cons. But pros outweighs the cons million:oneHow much has all of that helped us these past few years? In my lifetime we have made the playoffs quite a bit and it still hasn't helped us make a conference final or play on national TV often or sign a big time free agent or sell out regularly. If we actually had someone smart making our picks when we were in the lottery we may have some of those pros that you rave about. I feel like we have a smart GM now so let's get out of no man's land and get a good lottery pick. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 How much has all of that helped us these past few years? In my lifetime we have made the playoffs quite a bit and it still hasn't helped us make a conference final or play on national TV often or sign a big time free agent or sell out regularly. If we actually had someone smart making our picks when we were in the lottery we may have some of those pros that you rave about. I feel like we have a smart GM now so let's get out of no man's land and get a good lottery pick. Sent from my SPH-L710 using TapatalkOk but think about this. A Lebron James or Michael Jordan type player only comes around every 20 or so years. This type of player is not in this draft class or anywhere in the near future. If there was a Lebron type player then I would understand a little more, but it's non-existent this go round... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PSSSHHHRRR87 Posted February 25, 2014 Moderators Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 For the right price, I'd take any player in the league. I'd let Granger clear waivers and then take a shot at him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLien717 Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Ok but think about this. A Lebron James or Michael Jordan type player only comes around every 20 or so years. This type of player is not in this draft class or anywhere in the near future. If there was a Lebron type player then I would understand a little more, but it's non-existent this go round...Well it seems we just see it differently. I guess we are just going to have to agree to disagree good sir. Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camouflage Posted February 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 Well it seems we just see it differently. I guess we are just going to have to agree to disagree good sir. Sent from my SPH-L710 using TapatalkIndeed. Thanks for blabbering back and forth with me. It was fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IheartVolt Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 A newbie battle hell yea.. They coming in with fire in the belly now!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now