Plainview1981 Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Honestly, Mike could be under the impression that we're about to start rebuilding. Most vets want nothing to do with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakin Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hotlanta1981 said: Honestly, Mike could be under the impression that we're about to start rebuilding. Most vets want nothing to do with that. Thank you for your honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchman Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 7 hours ago, Hotlanta1981 said: Honestly, Mike could be under the impression that we're about to start rebuilding. Most vets want nothing to do with that. I suppose that is possible, but I think he got his boxers in a bunch because of all the rumors we were trying to find a third team to take him. Why should we have to "buy him out"? He is the one effectively breaching his contract. Don't let the door hit ya in the backside on the way out, Mikey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted January 9, 2017 Moderators Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Maybe he can't pass a physical. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchman Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Just now, macdaddy said: Maybe he can't pass a physical. Maybe we get KK back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 9 minutes ago, macdaddy said: Maybe he can't pass a physical. Think we might be at the point to accept his physical condition for the trade no matter what just to have that first where ever it lands and move forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted January 9, 2017 Moderators Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Just now, Thomas said: Think we might be at the point to accept his physical condition for the trade no matter what just to have that first where ever it lands and move forward. Can we accept it and then void his contract for breach if he doesn't show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, Thomas said: Think we might be at the point to accept his physical condition for the trade no matter what just to have that first where ever it lands and move forward. Nah, screw that. If he doesn't show, pull Kyle back and send him somewhere else for a real 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Just now, kg01 said: Nah, screw that. If he doesn't show, pull Kyle back and send him somewhere else for a real 1st. No no the league (Lebron) won't allow that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, macdaddy said: Can we accept it and then void his contract for breach if he doesn't show? Don't know but how sports contracts are handled favor the player that wants to abuse or break it seems like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 1 minute ago, Spud2Nique said: No no the league (Lebron) won't allow that... Didn't sound like Lebron was really enamored with Kyle considering he used his time to whine about no backup PG. Perchance he'd bless the reversal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Popular Post AHF Posted January 9, 2017 Moderators Popular Post Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Dunleavy can suck it. He is an empty contract that we can use in a trade. If he doesn't want to show up then we just won't pay him. That is actually the best case scenario for management - we get a trade asset on an expiring contract and we don't actually have to pay him. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 10 hours ago, sturt said: "Official" in what sense, @Sothron? It's clearly already been league approved b/c the teams both finally announced it on their websites. But regardless, the physical is just to protect, in this case, the Hawks. If they're of the opinion they want to make the trade and accept an injured player, that's their own discretion... or am I missing something? Dunleavy has to pass a team physical for the trade to be official. The league can't approve the trade until he passes a physical with the team he's going to. I'm assuming Korver has already done his with Cleveland. But Dunleavy is playing the one card he has, not showing up for a physical in Atlanta, in order to get a buyout. I don't know all the remedies the teams involved have over this but if Dunleavy never shows up for a physical then the NBA will void the trade. I want to say AK-47 did something like this two years or so ago when he was traded to Philly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators macdaddy Posted January 9, 2017 Moderators Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Hopefully we have Korver to GS for Zaza/ unprotected 1st in the chamber and ready to fire when the trade gets voided. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Sothron said: Dunleavy has to pass a team physical for the trade to be official. The league can't approve the trade until he passes a physical with the team he's going to. I'm assuming Korver has already done his with Cleveland. But Dunleavy is playing the one card he has, not showing up for a physical in Atlanta, in order to get a buyout. I don't know all the remedies the teams involved have over this but if Dunleavy never shows up for a physical then the NBA will void the trade. I want to say AK-47 did something like this two years or so ago when he was traded to Philly. The fact that Mo Williams does not, evidently, have to appear to take a physical would seem to stand in conflict with that conclusion. Pretty sure it's more accurate to say that the team, ATL in this case, can waive the physical if that's their decision. Not saying that's what ATL will do, but just that it would appear more precise to say the trade is officially done, but not beyond the point that one team can cry foul and void it based on the failure to take or pass a physical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Just now, sturt said: The fact that Mo Williams does not, evidently, have to appear to take a physical would seem to stand in conflict with that conclusion. Pretty sure it's more accurate to say that the team, ATL in this case, can waive the physical if that's their decision. Not saying that's what ATL will do, but just that it would appear more precise to say the trade is officially done, but not beyond the point that one team can cry foul and void it based on the failure to take or pass a physical. Teams can void trades by failing a player on the physical. Mo Williams is effectively retired, that's why no one cares about his physical. I'm hoping the Hawks can resolve this with Dunleavy so everything is officially done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 hehe... so we agree, @Sothron? Or am I missing some nuance there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, sturt said: hehe... so we agree, @Sothron? Or am I missing some nuance there? I'm not sure. If the Hawks want Dunleavy to play then he has to pass a physical. If they are willing to waive him or let him sulk at home...I don't know if it is needed. I know this situation is pretty much the same as AK-47 with Philly like 3 years ago but I can't remember all the details of how that played out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Sothron Posted January 9, 2017 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 Read this article from Woj on Yahoo: https://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources-seeking-buyout-mike-dunleavy-jr-resists-joining-hawks-on-new-york-trip-170349001.html Basically he has to report to the Hawks by 5 pm or the Hawks could either start fining him for not reporting or they could rescind the trade. It basically concludes that a buyout is coming. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 9, 2017 Report Share Posted January 9, 2017 16 minutes ago, sturt said: hehe... so we agree, @Sothron? Or am I missing some nuance there? Don't mind ol' Soth. He's fired up today due to some internat'l affairs. I think you're both right somehow. Perhaps, if Mo wanted to play, he'd probably have to pass a physical (at our request). Since he's "retired" it's probably just waived as unnecessary. Yeah, that sounds about right. I'm brokering peace all over the place today. #kg01forPresident2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now