Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $440 of $700 target

Can you call out the Hawks errors???


Diesel

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member

Let's ask this question..

Over the last ten years... what are some of the mistakes that the Hawks have made??

I already know that everybody will say resigning Baze... so let's take that off the table... what are some of the others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Peoriabird said:

Making Bud president of basketball operations/defacto GM which led to

1) The signing of Baze to that extension

2) Signing Delaney as the backup point guard

3) Trading Kelly Oubre away for nothing.

4) Allowing Al to walk for nothing

5) Not moving Millsap at the trade deadline which essentially led to him walking for nothing.

5) The signing of Dwight Howard and then deciding that he wasn't his kind of player.

Note: This all happened in 1 year.

 

That's the end of the thread. Bud was a horrible President of basketball operations

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
3 hours ago, Peoriabird said:

Making Bud president of basketball operations/defacto GM which led to

1) The signing of Baze to that extension

2) Signing Delaney as the backup point guard

3) Trading Kelly Oubre away for nothing.

4) Allowing Al to walk for nothing

5) Not moving Millsap at the trade deadline which essentially led to him walking for nothing.

5) The signing of Dwight Howard and then deciding that he wasn't his kind of player.

Note: This all happened in 1 year.

 

All of this. Bud was a disaster as the president/GM. We let two multiple All Star big men walk for NOTHING in back to back off seasons. That is unforgivable from any front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
5 hours ago, TheNorthCydeRises said:

Trading Dwight for pennies on the dollar, when they could've received something more significant had they just waited.  The same with the Joe Johnson trade.  In both instances, the new GM was so quick to sell of what they thought was a bad contract ( or a detriment to their new plan ), that they took far less than what the player was actually work.

Franchises like the Rockets don't do things like that.  Boston definitely didn't do it. 

Yeah.. The Dwight trade was us paying to give him away... It was terrible..

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
5 hours ago, Peoriabird said:

Making Bud president of basketball operations/defacto GM which led to

1) The signing of Baze to that extension

2) Signing Delaney as the backup point guard

3) Trading Kelly Oubre away for nothing.

4) Allowing Al to walk for nothing

5) Not moving Millsap at the trade deadline which essentially led to him walking for nothing.

5) The signing of Dwight Howard and then deciding that he wasn't his kind of player.

Note: This all happened in 1 year.

 

Oubre's trade made sense if we had plans for THJ.  But with no plans for THJr, that trade was stupid.  I also agree that we should have moved Milsap if we had no plans for him to the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
2 hours ago, MaceCase said:

In retrospect, not blowing up the 60 win team.  2 months defined the whole franchise trajectory.

Going slightly further back, not letting Joe walk and not blowing up WLOC.

No.. We did blow up the 60 win team.  We should not have.  DMC meant a lot.  Korver meant a lot.  Even Whoreford meant a lot to the success of that squad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Diesel said:

Even Whoreford meant a lot to the success of that squad.  

That's "Alice Whorefart" around these parts, okay and thanks.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Diesel said:

No.. We did blow up the 60 win team.  We should not have.  DMC meant a lot.  Korver meant a lot.  Even Whoreford meant a lot to the success of that squad.  

No they didn't.  Those guys were all held onto instead of traded at the peak of their value because of the win streak.  They never proved that they could win at that level beforehand or afterwards yet the Hawks paid the price for trying to hold onto them only to watch them leave or get traded years later for next to no return.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MaceCase said:

No they didn't.  Those guys were all held onto instead of traded at the peak of their value because of the win streak.  They never proved that they could win at that level beforehand or afterwards yet the Hawks paid the price for trying to hold onto them only to watch them leave or get traded years later for next to no return.

Plus,  we couldn't sign Demarre and Millsap both.  We picked correctly in my judgment.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

We could never have kept Demarre because of the CBA. If nothing else we'd still have all four if they wanted to cling to them with both Horford and Millsap making supermax money both over the age of thirty. Yeah...I think we made the right call there but we should have flipped them for max value. Instead we got ZIPPO for both of them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
48 minutes ago, MaceCase said:

No they didn't.  Those guys were all held onto instead of traded at the peak of their value because of the win streak.  They never proved that they could win at that level beforehand or afterwards yet the Hawks paid the price for trying to hold onto them only to watch them leave or get traded years later for next to no return.

Maybe this is the problem.   You never understood why that team won.   Each player played an important role and they all were irreplaceable.  Yet, we tried to replace them.   We should have never let Sap make it to the offseason without making a deal with either him or DeMarr and talked one of them into taking a one year deal so that we could offer a better deal the next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Diesel said:

Maybe this is the problem.   You never understood why that team won.   Each player played an important role and they all were irreplaceable.  Yet, we tried to replace them.   We should have never let Sap make it to the offseason without making a deal with either him or DeMarr and talked one of them into taking a one year deal so that we could offer a better deal the next year. 

I understood completely why they won, they played well above their heads as well oiled parts of a Ferrari engine.  Lose one part, let another rust, and yet another pick up grime and you have a $400,000 paperweight.  The Hawks failed to capitalize on the players' value, the players OTOH did not make such a mistake and they and their families are all too grateful for it.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...