Jump to content

2023-24 Insider Information Thread


AHF

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, JayBirdHawk said:

Which trade would you prefer?

 

Rockets:

DJ, AJ, CC for #3, Cam Whitmore, Jalen Green, Steven Adams

 

Spurs

DJ for #4, Keldon Johnson, 2025 Hawks pick back.

 

Add remove players as needed for salary matching or other options.

Um Rockets trade of course.  But why the heck would they make that trade?

There is zero chance they are giving up Whitmore, AND the #3 pick?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, warcore said:

Reed is an obvious pick for HOU to me. That's the only pick where one can just rationalize the pick based on what they need and his skillset. I like him. 

Is he that much of a better fit next to FVV and Green?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Why would the Spurs trade up? For Sarr?  Feels way too redundant with Wemby so Im guessing they want Risacher.  But if its true we want Clingan and Sarr goes to WAS, and Reed goes to HOU, why would they move up?

We must have other legitimate offers for #1 that would shake up the board.  Or what I feel is even more likely is we are using the Spurs for leverage.  Feels like our FO is close with them and they are constantly in rumors with us for that reason (like the DJ back to the Spurs nonsense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the 2019 draft thread, I posted 3 pick value charts with similar values. this is Pelton's.

http://nbasense.com/draft-pick-trade-value/2/kevin-pelton-2
 

We own #1 worth 100 points.

 

4+8 = 107.75 points

7+14 = 83 points.

 

Future firsts are project ranges and the lowest of the range is used for value.

So to those wondering why we haven't made the SA trade yet, 4+8 is slightly overvalued for 1.  SA would only do this if they overvalued a player who would go in the top 3 and this is the best deal they could get since Atlanta holds the cards here. If its Atlanta pushing to move down, they'd have to add value to the deal for it to be considered even, something in the area of pick 35, a second rounder. We do not have a second rounder this year.

To those wondering why no deal with Portland:  Portland's deal is undervalued by a 3rd 1st rounder in the 25 range. Portland would typically have to offer something to the Hawks to sweeten the deal since Atlanta holds the cards.

 

But as you can see, even 4 #20 picks don't quite = 1 first.  But in a crapshoot year draft, what is that 1sts value really?

1 4000 100.00
2 3100 77.50
3 2670 66.75
4 2410 60.25
5 2240 56.00
6 2110 52.75
7 2000 50.00
8 1910 47.75
9 1830 45.75
10 1720 43.00
11 1600 40.00
12 1500 37.50
13 1400 35.00
14 1320 33.00
15 1240 31.00
16 1180 29.50
17 1130 28.25
18 1080 27.00
19 1030 25.75
20 980 24.50
21 920 23.00
22 860 21.50
23 800 20.00
24 750 18.75
25 700 17.50
26 660 16.50
27 620 15.50
28 570 14.25
29 520 13.00
30 470 11.75

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
22 minutes ago, JeffS17 said:

Why would the Spurs trade up? For Sarr?  Feels way too redundant with Wemby so Im guessing they want Risacher.  But if its true we want Clingan and Sarr goes to WAS, and Reed goes to HOU, why would they move up?

We must have other legitimate offers for #1 that would shake up the board.  Or what I feel is even more likely is we are using the Spurs for leverage.  Feels like our FO is close with them and they are constantly in rumors with us for that reason (like the DJ back to the Spurs nonsense).

What stops us from taking Risacher and forcing them to trade #4 (Clingan) and more for him? It's what we did with Luka essentially, for better or worse 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AHF said:

I don’t.  Still too small.

I agree, I really just want Sarr.  Or I guess Clingan if we trade down and hope he can improve his jumper and stay healthy.  Both are huge asks IMO.  Unless Reed becomes a full-time PG he will always be a tough fit.  But I am 100% sold on Sarr, his talent and his work ethic.  I hope I am dead wrong on him b/c it looks like aren't going to take him.

 

It is weird though some of the teams that went deep in the playoffs were very small. 

See Boston (Tatum starts at PF) and NYK (Hart started at PF), Knicks were easily a conference finals team without OG going down, even with all the other injuries. Indy is pretty small too.

Not that I'm trying to replicate that but it's crazy how they get away with it.  Boston I can see b/c they are so talented at all 5 positions and can all shoot.  But NYK was starting Josh Hart (6'4") at PF.  I know Randle is the normal starter but still crazy to me.  Those teams just have much tougher players I guess.

This is why I want a 5 that can shoot, to unlock Trae even more.  He's never going to be as efficient as he can be with a lane clogger at the 5. 

 

Edited by AtLaS
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JayBirdHawk said:

 

Meanwhile the Spurs can have their new revised version of French Connection St-Eiffel Twin Towers 🙄.  :blanky:

One thing I do know, is we have no idea who the Spurs are taking if they move up to #1.

 

And there we are.  I wasn't even aware of that rumor of Sarr to San Antonio.  I just guessed it based on the tea leaves, how the NBA works and what I know the Hawks would do.  They have set this up beautifully.  If its Sarr, then San Antonio will just give the Hawks back those picks or a approximation of it, and move on with Sarr and Wemby.  

Edited by Hawkmoor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Hawkish said:

Is he that much of a better fit next to FVV and Green?

Do you actually think they see FVV as part of their future? No -- they had a wad of cap to blow on a veteran to be a stop gap until their youngins are ready. And yes he fits great with Green.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last cautionary (French) tale - Sekou Doumbouya.

 

In the 2019 draft, Doumbouya was getting lots of love and was projected to go between 7-12 in the lottery. When he dropped to 15, it was considered great value.  He was considered a raw talent with impressive upside.  He's out of the league now trying to revive his career in France.

https://www.nbadraft.net/players/sekou-doumbo

 

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JayBirdHawk said:

Which trade would you prefer?

 

Rockets:

DJ, AJ, CC for #3, Cam Whitmore, Jalen Green, Steven Adams

 

Spurs

DJ for #4, Keldon Johnson, 2025 Hawks pick back.

 

Add remove players as needed for salary matching or other options.

Spurs because the Rockets would hang up the phone....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
5 hours ago, kg01 said:

Or it means we don't even know what TF we're doing.  Based on history, which option fits us best?

Maybe if Landry isn't yet a Jerry West, maybe he can just be in a really really good intimate relationship with Lady Luck. Maybe he can get the roster back to postseason 2020-21 status. He's a Stanford kid, and my wife says he's easy on her eyes... so maybe he can just be that seductive to the Lady.

That's the realistic dream.

 

But of course... you know me... I'm just here to encourage one and all, just don't let yourself dream past that.

Next time the Hawks are at what is the equivalent of Everest Camp IV... the place from which to launch an assault on the summit... the mastermind/financier is going to be especially hard to orient and to be won over to the idea that you're at Camp IV, not Camp III.

So, just be lucid to the extreme likelihood that he's not going to be inclined to shell out the money for anything beyond the resources that got you that far, claiming he's been fooled before, and he just needs to wait to be certain.

Who knows, maybe he'll be right about that, just to be fair. But he might be wrong, too, and knowing that his highest priority is to end the trek with black ink, and that summitting is a secondary priority, a possible means to that end, he comes to that decision biased to his own self-interest, not our interest as fans.

And if someway somehow the mastermind's behaviors show he's a new man, converted to be one of us... True to ATL legitimately, not just as a throwaway marketing line... maybe the ultimate dream occurs down the road, And maybe you will have been among those who forced him to re-think his current priorities by being among those who declined to support what is, for now, primarily an ATM machine to him.

It will just be that much sweeter because you only invested yourself psychologically at that point that the ultimate, in fact, did become realistic... that the summit was both within view, and that the mastermind/financier was all-in, as eager to get there as any of the rest of us.

Maybe. Don't bet tomorrow's lunch on it, let alone next month's house payment on it, just based on the last 8 years and all the evidence we have...

But maybe, who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, warcore said:

Do you actually think they see FVV as part of their future? No -- they had a wad of cap to blow on a veteran to be a stop gap until their youngins are ready. And yes he fits great with Green.  

I don’t.  I didn’t realize Green was a larger, more defensive player.  I’ll have to check him out.  I thought he was a smaller chucker of a scoring guard.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's crazy to me that Ware has gotten no love from us.  Legit 7'0", 9'4.5" standing reach, 36" vertical, shot 40% from 3 and can catch lobs all day long.  

Is he just an awful defender?  Or is he dropping that far because he is a bad screener?  🤣

Mid first round is crazy to me for a prospect like that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...