Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Hawks look to draft Paul, sign Dalembert.....says


Admin

Recommended Posts

Chad Ford in todays Insider article. This just affirms what I was saying the other day about us drafting a PG and going big in FA. Of course we all know Ford could be full of it, but I am of the same opinion as him. I guess the bottom line is how does Knight rate Paul and Dalembert as a pair, as opposed to Bogut and Earl Watson as a pair. Those seem to be the 2 most common strategies for our offseason. Personally I would rather have Paul and Dalembert, but thats just because I like a more traditional PG and a shotblocking center.

Quote:


. Atlanta Hawks

Current record: 11-56

Projected record: 14-68

Skinny: Breathe easy, Hawks fans. The team is in no danger of repeating last season's fiasco. With the exception of home games versus the Bobcats, Hornets and Raptors, the rest of the season looks hopeless. Ironically, this year's Hawks squad actually has more talent than last year's, but they seem content to sleepwalk through the remainder of the season. For the second straight year, GM Billy Knight has given away his best player to a contender in an attempt to move up on draft night. This year, sources claim that the target is Paul. The Hawks have no point guard to speak of and believe they'll address their need in the middle via free agency. They plan on making a huge offer for Samuel Dalembert this summer. If they can somehow pull that off, the Hawks should be significantly improved next season. Al Harrington, Josh Smith and Childress have all been solid this year. Add an athletic shot blocker in the middle and a savvy point guard to run the show and the Hawks won't be contenders, but at least they'll be watchable. If Paul and Williams don't declare, the choice will be less obvious. Bogut would fit a need, but he doesn't quite fit the type of up-tempo, super-athletic team Knight is trying to build.


Here is the entire article with more stuff about the Hawks

Quote:


While roughly 20 teams are battling it out for 16 playoff seeds, there's another group with a different prize in mind.

For bad teams such as the Atlanta Hawks, Charlotte Bobcats and New Orleans Hornets, the goal no longer is Ws – it's lottery balls.

The NBA instituted the lottery system in 1985 in an attempt to discourage teams from deliberately tanking games late in the season in an effort to compile the worst record in the league and thus secure the No. 1 pick.

The lottery itself is weighted. The worst team in the league gets a 25-percent chance of getting the top pick. The second worst team gets a 20-percent chance. The third worst team a 15-percent chance and so on it goes.

It's been pretty successful – almost too successful. Since 1985, only three teams (Nets in 1990, Cavs in 2003 and Magic in 2004) with the worst record in the league have actually obtained the top pick in the draft.

Still, it hasn't totally discouraged teams from pulling up a bit short at the end. But even tanking can have unexpected consequences.

Last season, the Hawks traded away four of their best five players – Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Rasheed Wallace, Theo Ratliff and Nazr Mohammed– at the trade deadline in an attempt to cut payroll and get a better position to select local high school phenom Dwight Howard in the draft.

The players they got back – Zeljko Rebraca, Bob Sura, Joel Przybilla – weren't doing anything on their respective teams. The 18-36 Hawks weren't supposed to win another game all season.

Shockingly, their ragtag lineup went 10-18 the rest of the way, giving them just a 10 percent chance of landing the No. 1 pick, and Howard, on draft night. The team with the worst record, the Orlando Magic, did win the lottery. Meanwhile the Hawks settled for Josh Childress at No. 6. Regardless of whether you like Childress, there's a big difference between Childress and Howard. The Hawks' rebuilding plan took a major hit and, as you can tell by where they land on this year's list, they're still trying to pick up the pieces.

In other words, coaches and GMs, swallow your pride. Play the ball boy if you have to. Get as many Ping-Pong balls as you can. There will be only two or three players in this year's draft with immediate star potential – North Carolina's Marvin Williams, Wake Forest's Chris Paul and Utah's Andrew Bogut. However, only Bogut is a lock to actually declare for the draft. Both Williams and Paul claim they are leaning toward returning to college for another year. The rest of the draft is fairly deep, but there will be a pretty steep drop-off after those three.

Today, Insider takes a look at the schedules and recent trends and, based on the evidence, projects who has the best shot at the No. 1 pick in the draft.

Here's how we break it down:

LOTTERY WATCH

2. Charlotte Bobcats

Current record: 13-53

Projected record: 16-66

Skinny: We said before the start of the season that the dire predictions about the Bobcats being the worst team ever were overblown. The league is watered down enough and the Bobcats had enough young players to squeak out a few victories here and there. In reality, the Bobcats have been much better than expected. At home, they've played just about everyone extremely tough. Emeka Okafor is having a good rookie season, Gerald Wallace really started picking up his game before his injury, Primoz Brezec has proved more than capable in the middle and Brevin Knight has been resurrected from the dead, ranking second in the league in assists. That's all GM and head coach Bernie Bickerstaff was looking for – two or three building blocks going into next season. If the Bobcats get the No. 1 pick, sources insist that they'll grab Paul. He's a local product who fits perfectly into the system the Bobcats are developing. They are also fond of Williams, should he declare. Bogut is less of a fit because of Brezec and Okafor.

3. New Orleans Hornets

Current record: 15-52

Projected record: 17-65

Skinny: Major injuries to the Hornets' three best players collided with a move to the Western Conference, causing the Hornets to sink from playoff contender to the depths of despair. With the season getting out of hand, GM Allan Bristow decided to ride the wave, dumping Baron Davis, David Wesley, Jamal Mashburn and everyone else he could in an effort to cut payroll and get a better shot at No. 1. Luckily, their quest for the No. 1 pick hasn't taken a big hit since Jamaal Magloire returned to the lineup. Given the toughness of their schedule over the last month of the season, the Hornets should be right there in the scrum for No. 1. If they get it, sources claim that they love Williams. Of course, that might be enough to scare Williams back to Chapel Hill for another year.

4. Portland Trail Blazers

Current record: 23-43

Projected record: 25-57

Skinny: If you're going to tank the season, do what the Blazers did. With the team still in the hunt for the eighth seed in the playoffs, GM John Nash stayed pat at the trade deadline despite having several great trade assets, fired the coach, and then installed his own right-hand man, director of player personnel Kevin Pritchard, to do his bidding. Pritchard gave some of the veterans the rest of the season off, handed the starting point guard role over to high school phenom Sebastian Telfair and then sat on the sidelines and watched as the Blazers dropped 10 of their last 11 with Telfair steering the ship. Expect them to keep losing. The team has a tough schedule down the stretch and hasn't shown any signs of being able to win at home or on the road since the change. Unfortunately for Nash, it won't be enough to get them more than a 10 percent shot at No. 1. The Blazers have a huge lead in the win column over the Hawks, Hornets and Bobcats. Even if they go a projected 2-14 the rest of the way, they'll be 11 games ahead of the last-place Hawks. Sources claim that Nash is enamored with Bogut. Bogut's passing skills remind Blazers brass of Arvydas Sabonis. However, to get their hands on him, they are going to need some serious luck on draft night.

5. Utah Jazz

Current record: 21-46

Projected record: 26-56

Skinny: Last year, many thought the Jazz might be the worst team ever. Instead, they finished just short of a No. 8 seed in the West. This year, no one expected the Jazz to be competing with the likes of the Bobcats and Hawks for lottery balls. After signing Carlos Boozer and Mehmet Okur, it appeared they could make some serious noise in the West. However, chemistry issues combined with a major injury to Andrei Kirilenko have torpedoed the season for the Jazz. Considering that they started the season 7-3, their 14-43 record the rest of the way has been truly abysmal. The team's schedule is fairly soft the rest of the way, meaning the Jazz could finish the last 15 games of the season a respectable 5-10. When draft time comes around, their biggest need is a point guard. Since trading Carlos Arroyo to the Detroit Pistons, they've been a mess at the position. They also need an athletic, shot-blocking big man. Getting a guy like Paul would be huge, but chances are he'll be long gone before the Jazz pick.

6. Golden State Warriors

Current record: 23-45

Projected record: 29-53

Skinny: For months it looked like the Warriors were the worst team in the West. The Hornets had a worse record, but they were without their three top players. So what does GM Chris Mullin do? He raids the team during the trade deadline, bringing aboard Baron Davis in a risky move to upgrade the talent on this perennial loser. Davis has been absolutely awful so far, shooting 35 percent from the field for the Warriors. But the Warriors themselves have been much better, going 8-6 since the trade. More impressively, six of those eight wins have come on the road, more than doubling their road record all season. While the late-season turnaround won't be enough to save the season, the Warriors could be a force to be reckoned with next season if Davis can stay healthy, and get his shot back, and if they land a great pick in the draft. Mullin has his eye on Williams if the team should get the No. 1 pick, which could mean Mike Dunleavy's days in Oakland are numbered.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally, an article by Ford that makes sense. I say in addition to Dalembert we should make a run at Larry Hughes. Paul and Hughes would be our backcourt. Childress/Smoove/Harrington are interchangable in the frontcourt. Yeah, the team would be a lot more watchable. Plus, 2 more picks in the following year. Billy Knight is building this team the right way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I really like that idea.

We have FA money for a few FAs. Sign Dalembert, Brown or Swift (I think Brown will be cheaper) and Kapano for some outside shooting.

Drop Collier, then resign Lue and draft Paul. Nice looking lineup that will be competitive in a year

Dalembert/Drob

Harrington/Brown(Swift)

Smith/Diaw/D. Smith

Childress/Kapano

Paul/Lue/Ivey

I really like this team personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and what happens if none of the Bigs will sign with us?

then what?

if we can take bogut, we have to...he's not only the best player available IMO, but he's ready for the NBA and is a big, which we need

if we don't take bogut, then i want williams or splitter or a pg like felton, not paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Quote:


I really like that idea.

We have FA money for a few FAs. Sign Dalembert, Brown or Swift (I think Brown will be cheaper) and Kapano for some outside shooting.

Drop Collier, then resign Lue and draft Paul. Nice looking lineup that will be competitive in a year

Dalembert/Drob

Harrington/Brown(Swift)

Smith/Diaw/D. Smith

Childress/Kapano

Paul/Lue/Ivey

I really like this team personally.


I guess we'll be shooting for next year's top pick with this line up. Sounds like a good plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

attached to a guy with one decent year under his belt... it makes me want to vomit..

Also, Paul is a shrimp, there's no way in hell he'll go #1 or #2, which is where I think we will pick. Considering how few players of his size have succeeded in the NBA, I can't see us or anyone using that high of a pick on him.

How come everyone hates on Chad ford and bashes his stories as lies. But they believe this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we all know how Billy Knight loves to spill the beans about his plan to the media. I'm SURE BK told Chad all about what he plans to do in the draft confused.gif

He claims that BK wants a super athletic team. What else does BK want? a team with SIZE and LENGTH. What else does BK want bigs, and more than one!

Lue is a solid backup PG and Ivey has potential at PG...and why not add Earl Watson or McInnis at PG which would be better imo in the offseason to lead a young team if you want to get better right away? I think they would be cheaper than the bigs in FAcy who AREN't PROVEN just like BOGUt is "not proven".

So figure this out yourself. Some people love to be proven they are right by Chad Ford ? confused.gif

In my mind BK will choose Bogut or Marvin Williams if he has the opportunity if the draft were TONIGHT. We'll see after the workouts but I hope to god Chris Paul doesn't fall in our lap. His defense has me thinking JT all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Atlanta Hawks don't get a spot in the Top 3 picks this year.....I am totally convinced that all Atlanta franchises are cursed!!!

Knowing Atlanta's luck......Why do I have this feeling we are going to make history in getting the worse pick for a team with the worse record in the lottery. Why am I envisioning this nightmare??? Is it because Atlanta franchises never get good news (except for Braves in 95 and the Falcons recent success), especially when it comes to lotteries, coin flips, drafts, etc. The Atlanta Falcons have lost 2 coin flips in a row in the last two drafts.

I am going to be on pins and needles when they do the lotto during the playoffs and if we don't get the top spot.....I am going to be angry. I may do some research on who cursed this city when it comes to professional sports.

Even the 95 championship in Atlanta has an asterick by it because it was a strike shortened season. The Calgary Flames won their 1st Championship the year after they left Atlanta. This city has only 1 major professional sports championship and it has an asterick by it...Amazing!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:


I would rather take Bogut, but I can live with this plan if Knight does get Dalembert. Somebody is gonna have to put a foot in Paul's ass and teach him some defense though


I can live with it too. Just ran the 48 minute tool at espn for Dalembert. Translates to roughly 14pts 14 boards and 3.5 blocks. Course he will not get 48 minutes so that should get him close to Marcus Camby type production. He is already heavier than Camby and only 23 years old.

Just wonder how much BK would be willing to pay for someone who has never started for any real amount of time. Chad Ford though and even if these are real plans they do change on a dime. Gotta do the selection lotto and all the workouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just say no to Brown...and why in the world wouldwe want him...he still hasnt' shown anything...and you know what people..he's not a center. combine those two...why waste energy and effort on him if 'washington will match'...and I certainly dont want to overbid for him so that they think the offer's 'too high to match'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we shouldn't break the bank for him but he still has a ton of potential. If he can be had for $6M-$7M a season and it will take $9-$10M a season for Curry, Chandler or Dalembert, I'd just as soon take Kwame and use the left over money on something else. None of them are sure things anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

We have enough money to make Philly nervous. I think taking Webber has overextended them... Plus they will be trying to resign Kover, Green, also...

BK may feel that he knows the way to the Khandyshop and he might try to buy some Dally..... Right from under Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the craze for Brown either. Not only

does he appear to be soft, but he also probably

doesn't have alot of desire. He's played a decent

number of minutes since his rookie year and it

appears he has showed very little development.

He probably isn't as talented as some thought

coming out of the draft either. He's probably

will end up as just another Kandi Man.

His career highs are 16 points and 12 rebounds.

This is his 4th year! He should be putting up

close to those numbers on average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...