Premium Member Diesel Posted April 4, 2005 Premium Member Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 Realgm Link. Hmm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAHMOR Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 Even with Green having the better offensive versatility in high school I wouldn't trade him for Smith. Smith is the better dunker and more built for Nba play because of his extra weight. Also Josh can improve his offensive game but I don't believe Green can learn how to have the timing that Smith has when it comes to blocking shots and if you saw the blocks agains the Clippers how can you give that up. I felt sorry for Wilcox after I stopped laughing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBatPCSOM Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 I wouldn't call Green's propensity to wander around the three point line a better offensive skill set. Green has no in between game. It's either dunk off the break or shoot it from deep. This is a case of people trying to lop a high school kid, who wouldn't even have been in the top 8 players from last year's class, into the same class with those guys. There is just no way this guy is as good as Dwight Howard, Shaun Livingston, Josh Smith, J.R. Smith, Al Jefferson, Sebastian Telfair, Marvin Williams, or Rudy Gay. If there is a player that he closely resembles from last year's draft, it is Dorrel Wright, who went around the 19th pick or so. Last year's class was incredible, because you have the guys that are in the NBA currently, two players who would likely be the top two picks this year if they declared (Marvin Williams and Rudy Gay), and players who could be top 10 picks if they declared this year like Malik Hairston and Daniel Gibson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBAreject Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 Last year's high school class was the best in history. You almost couldn't go wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted April 4, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 Hmm..... Lebron went to HS with: Luol Deng, Chris Paul, Chris Taft, Charlie V., Marcus Slaughter, Outlaw, Ebi, and Perkins... Jordan went to HS with: ? John Stockton and Charles Barkley? Shaq was in HS with: And Let's not forget the Fab 5.... Didn't they start the same year that Grant Hill started? Or was it Mashburn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 The best high school class ever was 1998, the class that produced Alonzo Mourning, Christian Laettner, Billy Owens, Shawn Kemp, Stanley Roberts, Chris Jackson, Malik Sealy, LaPhonso Ellis, Don McLean, Chris Mills, Anthony Peeler and Derrick Martin. Obviously, not all of these guys became superstars but Mourning, Laettner and Kemp all achieved all-star status, but the depth of the class is truely impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 well if the new rule goes into place, then there won't be another hs class to consider... i don't consider anyone in the class that didn't make the leap to the nba...if they went to college, then they are in a college class, not a high school class... so within 3-4 years, we should know what the best class was...i guarantee it'll be better than 98... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 I meant 1988, sorry. I don't think you can look at a high school class and rate it based solely on who went pro right away, and not include players that went to college. If you look back, Alonzo Morning (stronger more physical Dwight Howard), Billy Owens (highly touted do everything forward - think Marvin Williams), Shawn Kemp (super-athletic big - bigger Josh Smith), Stanley Roberts (massive low post scoring machine - bigger Al Jefferson)and maybe others would have been top 10 picks. Mourning and Owens appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated, so they were hyped. Look at the 1988 draft, the Clippers would have had to make the same decision as the Magic this year - proven Collegian fresh off a national championship (Manning/Okafor)versus potential laden highschool prospect (Mourning/Howard): 1988 NBA Draft -------------- 1st Round --------- 1. Danny Manning Kansas LA Clippers 2. Rik Smits Marist Indiana 3. Charles Smith Pittsburgh Philadelphia 4. Chris Morris Auburn New Jersey 5. Mitch Richmond Kansas State Golden State 6. Hersey Hawkins Bradley LA Clippers 7. Tim Perry Temple Phoenix 8. Rex Chapman Kentucky Charlotte 9. Rony Seikaly Syracuse Miami 10. Willie Anderson Georgia San Antonio 11. Will Perdue Vanderbilt Chicago 12. Harvey Grant Oklahoma Washington 13. Jeff Grayer Iowa State Milwaukee 14. Dan Majerle Central Michigan Phoenix 15. Gary Grant Michigan LA Clippers 16. Derrick Chievous Missouri Houston 17. Eric Leckner Wyoming Utah 18. Rickey Berry San Jose State Sacramento 19. Rod Strickland DePaul New York 20. Kevin Edwards DePaul Miami 21. Mark Bryant Seton Hall Portland 22. Randolph Keys Southern Mississipi Cleveland 23. Jerome Lane Pittsburgh Denver 24. Brian Shaw UC Santa Barbara Boston 25. David Rivers Notre Dame LA Lakers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 it just isn't a hs class if u include college players... u may as well say...1970 was the best year for nba players born... if u talk about best college class ever, then u mean those that were drafted from college that year... if u talk about best hs class ever, u mean those that were drafted from hs that year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 I don't think most people would agree with your narrow interpretation of what constitutes a high school class. My more inclusive definition, which I believe is the how the term is traditionally used, is much more practical becomes it defines all players of a certain age. This way you can compare them versus their true peers. For example, if Marvin Williams someday surpasses the basketball exploits of Dwight Howard, he will be remembered as the greatest player from the 2004 high school class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 why not just say their birth year then? anyway, what do u call the direct-to-nba class? as in 2004's direct-to-nba class (howard/smoove/livingston/jr/jefferson/telfair/etc) was better/worse than 2003's direct-to-nba class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 Doesn't really matter what you call the prep-to-pro contingent. Also, 2004 is deeper then 2003, without question, but there is no one in the 2004 class that is like Lebron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted April 5, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted April 5, 2005 Well Nicholas, The reason why it's considerable because for years we have had the McDonalds HS All American game and the round ball classic. A part of the strength of a HS player who makes the jump is "Who did he play against in HS". When you look at Howard... he had all the gusy of that class. Lebron had Luol Deng and they had a great rivalry. Curry had Diop. and so on and so fourth... The strength of a HS player will be rated by who is in his class. When you consider guys he played against, it makes you realize how strong he is... Even if it's after the fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now