How about

[capstone21]

Something like Al and #2 and Lakers pick and (31 or Diaw) for something like Livingston, Wilcox and filler. Do you think the Clipps might bite? They are pretty high on Livingston so we would have to make the offer really good.

Then we go after Dalembert and maybe Hughes or Johnson

Livingston/Lue

Hughes/Kapano

Childress/Smith

Wilcox/Cheap FA

Dalembert/Drob

[CBAreject]

So #2 pick in 2005 + #31 pick in 2005 + #17 pick in 2006 + Al Harrington for Livingston/Wilcox????

No, no, and no

Marvin Williams

Salim Stoudamire

#17 in 2005

Al Harrington

for

Livingston/Wilcox

Ugh. Why do we have to give them those other 2 picks??? Why not #2/Al for Wilcox/Livingston (which is PLENTY fair, in my opinion). I'm still not sure I like it, though.

[Packfill]

I don't like that trade. Livingston is good but Wilcox is not as talented as Al. They would at least need to include their lottery pick.

[GST]

I would probably do IF I could bring myself to believe Livingston's health would hold up. Livingston's potential is probably higher than anyone in this years draft.

[PhillyDC]

clippers arent trading shaun livingston. not happening. sorry to burst you guys bubble, but his upside is higher than anyone in this year's draft, even whoever will be taken #1. they arent that dumb.

and Wilcox can be a true 15 and 10 PF if given the chance. Harrington isnt a bum, but he doesnt have a true position. Better off as a sixth man in my opinion.