PhillyDC Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 baron hasnt proven to be healthy. i like him though, if healthy he's easily better than chauncey and marbury. bibby - he!!!!!! no. bibby is good, but not better than chauncey. honestly, the only difference between bibby and JT is that bibby was on a good team in sacremento. JT did well with Dallas b/c he had a team around him for the 1st time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyman3 Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 barons a good player, dont get me wrong. he has that allaround game and is capable of putting up a triple double. But his shooting % (healthy or not) is horrible. as for Mike Bibby, id say hes in the same tier as Billups. u can make an argument for either player. both are good shooters, clutch, and can drive w/ as well as any other PG in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin chillzatl Posted July 25, 2005 Admin Report Share Posted July 25, 2005 Bibby is a far superiour POINT GUARD. He's not as good of an all-around player. But he's a better point guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now