Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 NBAdraft.net. SI Quote: Johnson is an enticing package to pro scouts. He can score inside and out, rebound and pass. He played four positions at Arkansas, even shifting to point guard on occasion. Inexperience is his biggest downside. So there you have it, JJ at PG was the exception, not the norm while at Arkansas. The same is true now. I don't think that Johnson is a guy that can read defenses and get us into and out of offensive sets. I think he's just another big ball handler similar to Diaw and Christie. I think it would be a mistake to pay him 70 million to come here for that purpose. Now.. IF we could move Chillz to the 3, Smoove the 4 and get a good trade for Al.. then maybe it would make since, especially if we could get Stoudamire. Even: DS, JJ, JC, JS, EC... Might not be so bad. But we have to start to show some respect for positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emorystar Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 You would take Damon over JJ? LMAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 I would take Damon and the 64 million dollars saved AND the chance to play Chillz at SG and Smoove at SF.. Than to take JJ and have Chillz on the bench or maybe traded... Point is that I'm not in total agreement of getting these guys that don't fit simply because we have money and they are available... That's stupid Babcock type GMing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emorystar Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Childress is a career 6th man. Only on a terrible team like the Hawks is he a starter. That's no knock on him, but you need to get used to the fact that Josh Smith & Marvin Williams are going to be the face of the franchise for the next plus decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Even if you think Chillz is starter-quality (which I do), it can be really nice to have a 6th man like that, who can back up a couple of spots and excel doing it. ESPECIALLY if the team is going to run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 No knock on JJ.. But would you pay 70 million dollars over 5 yrs for a Combo gaurd?? I'm looking forward for the face of the Hawks to be Chillz, Smoove. Al may or may not be here... Marvelous has a lot of proving to do for me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emorystar Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Quote: No knock on JJ.. But would you pay 70 million dollars over 5 yrs for a career 6th man? I'm looking forward for the face of the Hawks to be Chillz, Smoove. Al may or may not be here... Marvelous has a lot of proving to do for me... LOL @ JJ being a career 6th man. JJ would be capable of averaging 20/5/5 for ATL as soon as next year. If 10 years from now & Chillz is the face of the franchise, then something went terribly wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Quote: Quote: If 10 years from now & Chillz is the face of the franchise, then something went terribly wrong. [/indent] As long as he keeps his fro, I'm fine with that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 I think Chillz is probably the best talent we have next to Al and Chillz probably has the highest upside. I hear all this talk of Smoove and Marvin's upside... And I'm a smoove fan.. But look at Chillz for a minute. There is seemingly no place that Chillz can't be good. He's a good ball handler. He's a good rebounder. He's a good defender. He's a good shooter. He needs work on his three point shot. He's a good passer. Plus he has leadership potential. Rarely have there been rookie players that come in as versatile as Chillz. Smoove is not versatile. He does a few things well. Power basketball and shot blocking. He still has a lot to learn about defensive positioning which is 90% of good defense. He still has a lot to learn about many of the offensive skills like shooting and passing and ball handling. I think that because of his athleticism, he has a high ceiling but it's less likely that he will get there because of the skills he needs to master. Marvin... No doubt, I believe Marvin is just hype. He has a lot to prove to me. I watched intently that summer league game against Utah.. I have watched it 2 times now. I have not seen anything so mind blowing or eyebrow raising about Marvin. I didn't see it when he played for UNC either. I would have much rather we got Deron Williams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 I watched Joe Johnson when he was at Arkansas. You obviously didn't. The man that was setting their offense regardless of where he played was Joe Johnson. Next, you will try to say that Ronnie Brewer doesn't set the offense for Arkansas. After all, he's 6'7" tall. That means he can't be a point guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 ....because it would be a move that has no direction. It goes completely against the philosophy the Hawks have. No worry though. Damon will be signing with Memphis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 "Childress is a career 6th man" How would you know that? He has played a year in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Dude you must have forgot... Not only did I watch JJ, I wanted JJ to be a Hawk more than anybody on this board. I was pissed when Boston traded JJ and we were not in the mix. Listening to you consistently say JJ played PG in College.. I had to not only rebuke your statment, but back up what I said... Which you can't. JJ played the 2/3 mostly. They had Pargo and Cleveland playing PG. Mostly Pargo. They were an uptempo team that ran constantly and blew teams out. They played Kentucky.. Beat Kentucky when Kentucky sported Bogans/Prince. Bogans scored like 25 points and was on fire.. But they couldn't get close. Cleveland scored like 3 points maybe he didn't score at all, but he caused all sorts of problems on both ends... I wouldn't be surprised if he had 10 assists with 0 points. JJ was the man in that game. He couldn't be stopped. Anyway... JJ was not playing PG... It was not a usual thing for him to play PG... Unlike the BS you're selling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 29, 2005 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 You mean like signing Jax or Walker or Drobs or Lue... Come on KB.... BK does it all the time. He signs guys who does not "fit" in order to get talent! That's the same thing here. DS is probably the most experienced PG on the FAcy market. It would be a good thing to get him because he can still run, he can still hit the three, and he can still get us into and out of offensive sets.. He's a good stop gap until we can get RONDO ready! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Wrong. Pargo was a spot up shooter. Joe Johnson was the primary ball handler the Hogs had at that time. Joe Johnson set the table for the Hogs offense, just as Ronnie Brewer does now. But I keep forgetting. Joe is 6'8" tall, that means he can't be a point guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 I will ask you again KB, if Joe Johnson is a great point guard, why did Phoenix work so hard to get Nash?..Its because while Joe can run the point on occasion,but he is just like a more refined Boris Diaw..He is slow, methodical, and cannot penetrate..There is also no way in hell Joe will ever guard the likes of Iverson and Wade.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Johnson slow? When did this happen? Oh, I keep forgetting. He's 6'8", which means he is too slow to be a point guard. You have to be a 5'9" midget to play point guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Quote: I will ask you again KB, if Joe Johnson is a great point guard, why did Phoenix work so hard to get Nash?..Its because while Joe can run the point on occasion,but he is just like a more refined Boris Diaw..He is slow, methodical, and cannot penetrate..There is also no way in hell Joe will ever guard the likes of Iverson and Wade.. To be devil's advocate, Nash didn't exactly do a whole lot of guarding either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmac13 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Answer the question, why didn't the suns let him play the point? They sure would be in alot better financial shape now if they didn't sign Nash to that huge deal..Its because they know he is not a point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swolehawk2 Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 "Iverson and Wade" Yeah Nash can't guard them either and he is the MVP at PG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now